Carotid stenting or endarterectomy? considering vascular anatomy…

Complex vascular anatomy could increase the risk of periprocedural stroke during carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, no randomize study has provided evidence showing this potential difficulty should inform the choice between carotid stenting and endarterectomy. 

La endarterectomía precoz parece superior a la angioplastia carotidea en pacientes sintomáticosThis study included 184 patients with symptomatic lesions of the internal carotid randomized to CAS vs. endarterectomy in the context of the ICSS trial (International Carotid Stenting Study). Patients had all received an MRI (n=126) or a CT (n=58) prior to procedure, and an MRI after procedure.

 

The study looked at the association between aortic arch configuration, angles of supra aortic vessels, stenosis degree and length, and the presence of plaque ulceration, with the presence of at least one or more new ipsilateral ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI+) after procedure.

 

49 of the 97 patients in the CAS group (51%) and 14 of the 87 in the endarterectomy group (16%) presented new lesions on DWI (OR 6.0; CI 95%, 2.9–12.4; p<0.001).

 

In the CAS group, type 2/3 aortic arch configuration (OR 2.8; CI 95%, 1.1–7.1; p=0.027) and internal carotid angulation (≥60° vs <60°; OR, 4.1; CI 95% 1.7–10.1; p=0.002) were associated to DWI+, even after correction for different factors, such as age.

 

The latter wasn’t true for the endarterectomy group, given it was not possible to identify independent predictors of new lesions on DWI.

 

The greatest risk for CAS over endarterectomy was seen in patients with the largest internal carotid angle (≥60°) (OR 11.8; IC 95% 4.1–34.1).

 

Conclusion

The complex anatomy of the aortic arch and mainly the tortuosity of the internal carotid increase the risk of ischemic events during CAS in symptomatic patients, which did not result true for endarterectomy. Vascular anatomy should be taken into account when choosing either one.

 

Editorial Comment

The complexity of the aortic arch and supra aortic vessels will certainly increase the technical challenge of CAS. The repeated attempts to advance catheters or inductor sheaths could lead to endothelium traumas or even plaque destruction, which in turn could lead to cerebral embolism.

 

The ICSS protocol did not consider any details as regards measures to prevent this kind of inconveniencies, such as the number of attempts before giving up, limiting the number of maneuvers, heparin concentration, or necessary experience for the most challenging cases.

 

Researchers might have neglected the necessary precautions that should be taken into account when interpreting outcomes.

 

Plaque characteristics, stenosis degree, plaque extension or the presence of ulceration previously assessed with MRI or CT were not predictors of new lesions at diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance after CAS.

 

Original Title: Vascular Anatomy Predicts the Risk of Cerebral Ischemia in Patients Randomized to Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy.

Reference: Mandy D. Müller et al. Stroke. 2017 May; 48(5):1285-1292.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | SIRONA: Randomized Study Comparing Sirolimus-Coated vs Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Femoropopliteal Disease

This prospective, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated non-inferiority study compared the use of sirolimus-coated balloon (MagicTouch) vs paclitaxel-coated balloon in endovascular treatment.  The primary objective was to...

TCT 2024 | PEERLESS: Mechanical Thrombectomy with FlowTriever vs Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Intermediate Risk PTE

Pulmonary embolism (PE) continues to be the third cause of cardiovascular mortality. The current clinical guidelines recommend anticoagulation in intermediate risk patients presenting right...

Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: To Revascularize or Not

At long term, atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) can lead to hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and cardiac failure. Historically, these patients have been referred...

Endovascular Management of Chronic TEPH: Is Coronary Management Extrapolatable in This Scenario?

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a condition that causes significant functional limitation. Its surgical treatment, known as pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), has improved the...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...