Should We Begin to Use IVUS in CTO?

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Currently, chronic total occlusions (CTO) are one of the obstacles that coronary angioplasties must overcome, particularly with the development of drug-eluting stents (DES) and new devices and strategies for these challenging lesions. However, there is little information on the safety, efficacy, and real clinical benefit of implanting stents of over 60 mm (known as full metal jackets, FMJ).

Should We Begin to Use IVUS in CTO?

This study enrolled 406 consecutive patients with chronic occlusions localized in one of the major epicardial arteries. They received FMJ with DES (the type of DES, the strategy, and the devices used for rechanneling were left at the operator’s discretion).

 

The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, treated-vessel acute myocardial infarction, target-lesion revascularization, or re-occlusion during follow-up.

 

The mean age for this sample was 59.6 years old (most patients were male). Overall, 35% of all patients had diabetes and 70.2% presented dyslipidemia, 26.8% were smokers, 32.8% had undergone a prior angioplasty, and 3.9% had undergone previous myocardial revascularization surgery (MRS). Chronic stable angina was found in 80% of the population. The ejection fraction was 57%.


 

Also read: “Successful CTO Reduces Local and Remote Residual Ischemia.”


 

Multivessel lesions were found in 60.3% of all cases, left main coronary artery (LMCA) in 5.4%, and multiple CTOs in 9.4% of the patients. CTOs were more frequently located in the right coronary artery, followed by the anterior descending artery. The J-CTO score was 2.3 and there was blunt stump in 60% of all cases. Occlusions ≥20 mm: 40%.

 

The most used DES type was the second-generation DES (63%). In general, 2.5 ± 0.6 stent/patient were implanted: stent length was 76.8 ± 14.6 mm, and stent diameter was 3.2 ± 0.4 mm. IVUS was used in 90.6% of all cases, with a 503-mL contrast and a 60-minute fluoroscopy time. Peri-procedural acute myocardial infarction was found in 10 subjects (0.25%).

 

The follow-up was 5.1 years (2.4-7.1); the primary endpoint was present in 16% of all cases, the rate of overall mortality was 8.4%, and the rate of cardiac death was 5.7%. There were 17 patients who experienced re-occlusion and 5 cases of stent thrombosis (4 definitive ST and 1 probable ST).


 

Also read: “The Use of IVUS in Unprotected Left Main PCI Associated to Better Outcomes, Compared to Angiography Guided PCI.”


 

In a multivariate analysis, the number of implanted stents (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16 to 2.54; p = 0.006) and persistent distal luminal narrowing (HR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.66 to 4.47; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of TLF.

 

Conclusion

CTO angioplasty with FMJ and DES provides acceptable long-term clinical results. Persistent distal luminal narrowing increases the future likelihood of adverse events despite procedural success.

 

Editorial Comment

This is a “real world” analysis with an acceptable long-term evolution, but we must take into account that the patients who presented CTO belonged to a group with more advanced coronary disease and a history of angioplasty and MRS, compared to patients without CTO. Surely, this must have impacted negatively on their long-term evolution.

 

The high rate of IVUS use, which probably contributed to better stenting, particularly in calcified or overlapping lesions, is an interesting piece of information.

 

In the future, the use of IVUS during FMJ implantation in CTO lesions will probably be mandatory (as it now is in cases of LMCA angioplasty).

 

Furthermore, we must take into account that these procedures are long and require high contrast. Finally, we must always overcome the learning curve.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

Original title: Full Metal Jacket with Drug-Eluting Stents for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion.

Reference: Pil hyung Lee et al, J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 2017. Article in Press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Sua opinião nos interessa. Pode deixar abaixo seu comentário, reflexão, pergunta ou o que desejar. Será mais que bem-vindo.

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...