MitraClip Procedure Can Be Performed without General Anesthesia

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Avoiding general anesthesia in intervention procedures has the benefits of faster recovery and shorter hospitalization. This has been already analyzed in the context of TAVR, but not in MitraClip procedures.

Es posible realizar MitraClip sin anestesia general

The present study analyzed 232 patients receiving the MitraClip. 76 of these procedures were done under general anesthesia (32.7%) and 156 under deep sedation (67.3%).


Read also: The SOURCE 3 Confirms the Good Outcomes of the SAPIEN 3 at One Year Followup”.


Populations were similar in age, comorbidities, EuroScore, severity of mitral failure, left and right ventricular function, and renal function.

 

Both strategies saw safe MitraClip implantation, with no difference in number of implanted clips, or residual mitral failure (with low complications rate). Only 2 patients required conversion to general anesthesia. Total procedural time was lower with deep sedation (DS), driven mainly by preparation.

 

Intensive care was shorter with DS (2.6±4.4 vs. 1.5±1.4 p=0.003). However, hospital stay was similar.


Read also: New Study Confirms TAVR Durability at 5 Years”.


At 90 day follow up, both groups improved functional class and quality of life, saw reduced systolic pressure and BNP.

 

Conclusion

MitraClip implantation with DS is as safe and effective as with general anesthesia.

 

Commentary

Simplifying endovascular procedures with no quality compromise has always been beneficial.

 

Performing MitraClip procedures without general anesthesia reduced intensive care days, but with no difference in overall hospital stay. This might be because the researchers looked at patients between 2011 and 2015. After gaining experience and improving devices, this factor might improve as well. 

 

To know the kind of patients that will benefit from this strategy calls for further research.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

Original Title: Deep Sedation Vs. Geneal Anesthesia in 232 patients undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve repair using the MitraClip® System.

Reference: Patrick Horn, et al Catheterization Cardiovascular Intervention 2017 Published online.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...