NCDR ACTION Registry: Anticoagulated Patients with No Higher Risk of Bleeding in Emergency Procedures

Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation treated with warfarin or any of the new direct oral anticoagulants undergoing acute myocardial infarction do not present higher risk of bleeding when receiving angiography or angioplasty. In fact, this subgroup of anticoagulated patients showed lower in-hospital mortality than the control group.

NCDR ACTION Registry: los pacientes anticoagulados no tienen mayor riesgo de sangrado en los procedimientos de urgencia

After analyzing 6471 patients undergoing ST elevation MI and 19954 patients undergoing non-ST elevation MI included in the ACTION registry, it was observed 71.3% of atrial fibrillation patients do not receive anticoagulants, 15.7% receive warfarin and 13% receive one of the new anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban o dabigatran).

 

There were no significant differences in bleeding risk between patients on anticoagulants and no anticoagulants patients. In addition, this was true for both STEMI and NSTEMI patients.


Read also: FOURIER: Evolocumab Found Beneficial for Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease of Prior MI”.


The use of warfarin was associated with a 22% reduction of in-hospital death and direct oral anticoagulants with a 39% reduction (both compared against no anticoagulation).

 

Original title: Management and outcomes of myocardial infarction in the age of direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation: a report from the NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG.

Reference: Feldman DN et al. American Heart Association 2017 Scientific Sessions. November 12, 2017.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: does it really help reduce contrast use?

Contrast-induced nephropathy remains a relevant complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and complex coronary anatomies. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Transcatheter Deep Vein Arterialization in Critical Limb Ischemia Without Revascularization Options

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia in patients without conventional revascularization options represents one of the most challenging scenarios within peripheral arterial disease, with 1-year major amputation...

Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: Mid-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

Paravalvular leaks (PVL) are a frequent complication following surgical valve replacement, occurring in 5% to 18% of prosthetic valves. Incidence varies according to valve...

After a Major Bleeding Event in Atrial Fibrillation: When Should Left Atrial Appendage Closure Be Considered?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who experience a major bleeding event represents a complex clinical scenario in which percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)...