Peri-Procedural Infarction: More Frequent than and Not as Innocent as We Thought

Almost 30% of all patients experience some degree of myocardial injury after elective angioplasty, a statistic associated to an increase in cardiovascular events at 30 days and 1 year, according to this study recently published in Eur Heart J.

infarto peri-procedimientoThe study only included consecutive patients who underwent elective angioplasty with a negative troponin level at admission. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of peri-procedural infarction (type 4a infarction), stent thrombosis (type 4b), and myocardial injury according to the third universal definition of infarction.

Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of infarction and myocardial injury, and their relation to 30-day and 1-year events.


Read also: ACC 2018 | SECURE-PCI: High Dose of Statins pior PCI Could Help.


Among 1390 patients who underwent elective angioplasty, the primary endpoint was observed in 28.7% of cases, including 7.0% of type 4a infarction, 0.14% of type 4b infarction, and 21.6% of myocardial injury.

Independent risk factors were left main disease, total stent length >30 mm, multiple stenting, chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min), and age >75 years old.

At 30 days, patients with peri-procedural infarction or myocardial injury had a higher rate of cardiovascular events (5.5% vs. 1.2%; p < 0.001), which was mainly driven by ischemic events (3.2% vs. 0.6%; p < 0.0001).


Read also: Surgery Seems Superior to Angioplasty in Young Patients.


At 1 year, the risk of events remained higher for patients with peri-procedural infarction or myocardial injury (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

Peri-procedural infarction and myocardial injury are frequent complications of elective angioplasty and are associated with an increase in cardiovascular events at 30 days and 1 year.

Original title: Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Injury in Elective Coronary Stenting.

Reference: Michel Zeitouni et al. Eur Heart J. 2018 Apr 1;39(13):1100-1109.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...