Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute myocardial infarction recurrence (AMI). However, the clinical benefit of preloading DAPT, pretreatment with aspirin and P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, remains controversial, and the most recent European guidelines advise against its use in patients with non ST elevation ACS (NST-ACS).

The aim of this study carried out by Goh et al. was to assess the prevalence of preloading DAPT and its clinical outcomes in a contemporary cohort of patients in Victoria, Australia, included in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR) between 2014 and 2021.

42,453 PCI procedures done for ACS were looked at; 79% of these patients received DAPT prior intervention (n=33,520). Pretreated patients were generally younger and presented fewer comorbidities, such as peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, kidney failure and a store of revascularization surgery. The most used antiaggregant was ticagrelor, vs thienopyridine inhibitors (59.5% vs. 23.4%).

At raw analysis, the pretreated group presented lower inhospital mortality (2.6% vs. 5.6%; p<0.001) and at 30 days (3.3% vs. 6.4%; p<0.001), as well as lower major cardiovascular events incidence (MACE) at 30 days (5.5% vs. 8.8%; p<0.001) and lower major bleeding rate (1.0% vs. 1.7%; p<0.001). However, after adjusting form variables with multivariable analysis, no significant differences were found in total mortality, MACE or stent thrombosis. 

DAPT preloading was independently associated with reduced incidence of major bleeding at 30 days (OR 0.79; CI95%: 0.65–0.96; p=0.02), particularly in the NST-ACS subgroup. An exploratory analysis showed the use of thienopyridines might be associated with lower MACE rate vs ticagrelor (OR 0.81; CI95%: 0.70–0.94; p=0.006).

Read also: Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

When stratifying by presentation type (SCASEST vs. SCACEST), no significant differences were found as regards mortality or MACE.

Conclusions

In this contemporary cohort of ACS patients in Australia, DAPT preloading was common practice, though it was not independently associated with reduced mortality, MACE or stent thrombosis. 

Original Title: Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Outcomes in Contemporary Practice.

Reference: Goh SH, Batchelor R, Dinh D, Brennan A, Peters S, Stub D, Reid C, Chan W, Liew D, Wilson W, Lefkovits J; VCOR investigators. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Outcomes in Contemporary Practice. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31520. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40195707. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...