Improved efficacy and also increased bleeding with Rivaroxaban in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Original title: Rivaroxaban in Patients Stabilized After a ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Results From the ATLAS ACS-2–TIMI-51 Trial. Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction-51. Reference: Jessica L. Mega et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1853–9.

Morbidity and mortality rates following AMI have progressively declined in the last decades due to the use of new drug strategies. However, even now with the long term treatments based on the double scheme anticoagulant and anti ischemic therapies, patients that have suffered a coronary event still have a high risk of adverse cardiovascular events, including death, in the short and long term. This is the reason behind the renewed interest in proving how effective would be to add an anticoagulant, in this case, an anti-Xa, to the treatment with AAS and one thienopyridine. 

The study ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51, published in NEJM in 2011, 15 526 patients with acute coronary syndrome were analyzed, and within 1 to 7 days from the event they were randomized to Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice a day, Rivaroxaban 5 mg twice a day or placebo. The study showed benefits in favor of the use of Rivaroxaban in this kind of patients. However, the authors showed particular interest in STEMI patients. This pre specified analysis of the subgroup showed the use of Rivaroxaban after patient stabilization in addition to the regular AMI treatment reduces the combined primary end point of cardiovascular death, AMI and stoke, compared to placebo (8.4% vs. 10.6%, HR 0.81; p=0.019) at the expense of increasing non surgical bleeding (2.2% vs. 0.6%; p<0.001) and intra cranial bleeding (0.6% vs. 0.1%; p= 0.015), with no significant difference in fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.1%, p =0.51).

In analyzing the two Rivaroxaban doses used in the study, it was seen that the twice a day 2.5 mg dose reduce cardiovascular death significantly compared to placebo, but not the 5 mg dose. This could be explained by the fact that the authors included as cardiovascular death, death associated to bleeding events. There was also a significant difference in the three types of bleeding (major, intra cranial and fatal) in favor of the 2.5 mg dose.

Conclusion: 

In patients with acute coronary syndrome with STEMI, Rivaroxaban reduces cardiovascular events. This benefit is obtained in the early phase of treatment, at treatment start, and continues with the association of anticoagulants. Rivaroxaban increases major bleeding but was not significant as regards fatal bleeding.

Editorial Comment: 

Apparently, from these substudy ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 data, it would be beneficial to use Rivaroxaban after an AMI with STEMI in 2.5 mg twice a day doses. However, we have to take into account that no patient was being treated with Prasugrel or Ticagrelor (more and more used as a post STEMI treatment) and that the original study excluded those patients with increased bleeding risk. Therefore, despite the conclusive results, we need more information to be able to offer the anticoagulant benefit to our patients without increasing their bleeding risk. 

 

Courtesy of Dra. María Sol Andrés.
Hospital Universitario
Fundación Favaloro. Argentina.

Dra. María Sol Andrés.

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. In this context, the IVUS-CHIP trial was designed to evaluate...

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Management of Valve Thrombosis in TAVI: Current Evidence-Based Approach

The expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) into younger and lower-risk populations has brought bioprosthetic valve thrombosis to the forefront as a clinically...

Experience with the intra-annular self-expanding Navitor valve: data from the STS/ACC TVT registry

The expansion of TAVI, with the introduction of new-generation devices, has prioritized not only periprocedural safety, but also the preservation of coronary access, more...

Therapeutic strategies in carotid free-floating thrombus: evidence and controversies

Carotid free-floating thrombus (cFFT) is a rare entity with a high embolic risk, associated with acute neurological events such as stroke or transient ischemic...