Periprocedural Infarction vs. Spontaneous Infarction: Prognostic Significance 

Original title: Comparison of the Prognosis of Spontaneous and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention–Related Myocardial Infarction. Reference: Sergio Leonardi, MD et al. Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 60, No. 22, 2012

Clinical significance of myocardial infarction (MI) associated to coronary angioplasty is a controversial issue worldwide. Most of research on coronary disease includes it as a primary end point weighed against spontaneous MI.

The aim of this study was to compare periprocedural MI vs. spontaneous MI. It analyzed data from 9,087 patients enrolled in two trials that assessed Non ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (EARLY-ACS and SYNERGY): among these, 893 periprocedural MI and 298 spontaneous MI occurred, and ratios for death at 12 months were compared.

Authors defined periprocedural MI as CK-MB more than 3 times the ULN (upper limit of normal). Adjusted hazard ratios for 1-year death were 1.39 (95% CI: 1.01 to 1.89) for periprocedural MI vs. 5.37 (95% CI: 3.9 to 7.38) for spontaneous MI. In determining the CK-Mb threshold for periprocedural MI to achieve the same prognosis as spontaneous MI, it was observed that elevations of 27 times the ULN were necessary for this to happen.

Conclusion 

The definition of periprocedural infarction used in clinical trials is poorly associated to events, compared to spontaneous infarction.

Editorial Comment:

This study confirms an assumption based on intuition, that cardiac enzymes elevation after angioplasty does not have the same prognosis than Type 1 MI. Further evaluation is required to confirm these results using the new definition of periprocedural MI (a 5 times increase of troponin levels with clinical or electrical signs or ischemia image). Despite the above observations, this study is good news for interventional cardiologists.

Courtesy of María Sol Andres, MD
Hospital Universitario
Fundación Favaloro – Argentina

Dra. María Sol Andrés para SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

TCT 2025 | VICTORY Trial: super-high-pressure NC balloon vs. IVL in severely calcified coronary lesions

Recent studies such as ECLIPSE have demonstrated the safety of non-compliant (NC) balloons compared with orbital atherectomy, while IVL has shown efficacy in registries...

TCT 2025 | SELUTION4ISR: sirolimus-eluting balloon for in-stent restenosis

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to be a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary PCI practice. In the DES era, its incidence reaches 4–8% during the...

TCT 2025 | SELUTION DeNovo: sirolimus-eluting balloon vs. stent in de novo coronary lesions

The use of drug-eluting stents (DES) remains the standard strategy in most percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. However, mid- to long-term studies have shown...

HELP-PCI: A Fleeting Advantage of Early Heparin in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction?

In ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), immediate reperfusion through primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) remains the treatment of choice. However, the interval between the first...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....