Ticagrelor reduces in-stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Original title: Stent thrombosis with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: An analysis from the prospective randomized PLATO trial. Reference: Steg PG et al. Circulation. 2013; Epub ahead of print

The PLATO study randomized 18624 patients with acute coronary syndrome to receive ticagrelor   (180 mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice daily ) or clopidogrel ( 300 or 600 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg per day ) . The results of this study published in NEJM showed a reduction in the composite of cardiac death , heart attack and stroke ( primary end point ) .

This paperwork reported the results of 61% of patients in the PLATO (n = 11289 ) who received angioplasty with stent either prior to study ( n = 1404 ) or during the same ( n = 9885 ) . At 12 months the definitive in-stent thrombosis was significantly lower with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel ( 1.37 % versus 1.93 % , HR 0.67 , CI 0.5-0.9 , p = 0.0091 ) .The result was similar when considering all thrombosis together (definite, probable and possible) with 2.94 % for ticagrelor branch versus  3.77 % for the clopidogrel branch (HR 0.77, CI 0.62 to 0.95 , P = 0.013 ) .

The definitive thrombosis rate was consistently lower with ticagrelor beyond the type of acute coronary syndrome , diabetes , drug-eluting stent use , use of glycoprotein IIbIIIa , etc). Out of 147 cases with definite thrombosis furthermost  were subacute (58.5 % ) , followed by late thrombosis (24.5 %) and acute ( 17 % ) .Ticagrelor decreased subacute thrombosis and late but not acute ( within 24 hours).Patients with stent thrombosis showed a higher risk of bleeding and death from all causes after the event than they had before.

Conclusion: 

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel reduces the incidence of stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes , with a benefit consisting of a wide range of patients , stents and treatment characteristics .

Editorial Comment:

Although the absolute difference in stent thrombosis is small, this complication is associated with a high mortality rate and myocardial infarction (confirmed in this study once more).

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...