Type B Aortic Dissection over a 5-year period: lower mortality than medical therapy.

Original title: Survival After Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Type B Aortic Dissection. A Report From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Reference: Rossella Fattori et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2013;6:876–82.

Endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta is becoming a viable alternative, though its efficacy had not been followed up longer than two years.

This study was based on the IRAD registry (International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection) and compares long term outcomes of TBAAD receiving treated with TEVAR (thoracic endovascular repair) vs. medical therapy alone. The IRAD is a 24 center registry designed to provide information on TBAAD patients.

From 3865 patients included in the registry between 1995 and 2012, 1133 were diagnosed with type B dissection, 853 (74.8%) received medical therapy alone and 276 (25.2%) received TEVAR. TBAAD patients that required open surgery during the acute phase (n=183, 13.6%) were not included in this analysis.

Since it was not randomized, the study used a multivariate model with propensity score to balance the baseline differences between both groups. In-hospital mortality was similar for both strategies (10.9% TEVAR vs. 8.7% medical therapy, p=0.273) also at one year follow up. However, TEVAR had significantly lower mortality at five years, (15.5% vs 29%, p=0.018).

At five years, the descendant aorta diameter was also different between the groups: 42 mm for TEVAR patients and 46mm for medical therapy (p=0.034).

Conclusion: 

History supports the use of medical therapy for TBAAD. In the IRAD registry, TBAAD treated with TEVAR showed better survival rates compared to the medical therapy group. It seems that early intervention with TEVAR should be indicated for patients with uncomplicated TBAAD.

Editorial Comment

Patients who received TEVAR often presented signs of malperfusion (20.6% vs 4.8%; p<0.001) shock, periaortic hematoma, mesenteric ischemia, spinal cord ischemia, renal failure, etc. (61.7% vs 37.2%; p<0.001). Despite the above short-term results were similar to long-term medical treatment and higher. The Xin Jia group had already published in J Vasc Surg a similar cohort with similar outcomes, which adds more evidence in favor of TEVAR for TBAAD patients. 

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

A New Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Paradigm? CREST-2 Trial Unified Results

Severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis continues to be controversial seeing the optimization of intensive medical therapy (IMT) and the availability lower periprocedural risk revascularization techniques....

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...