TVAR live edited broadcasts are safe.

Original title: The impact of live transmition on patients outcomes during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Results fron the VERITAS study. Reference: Ron Waskman, et al. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 2014;15:63-68

 

With the advancement of medical technology and the great development of telecommunications, performing live or edited cases has become a common occurrence in medical education, but one of the points of discussion was always the safety of these procedures. This is a multicentre, retrospective observational case-control study. The endpoint of this analysis was the safety of patients receiving percutaneous aortic valve replacement (TVAR) during live broadcasts. Valves used were, for femoral access CoreValve and for femoral or apical access, Edwards SAPIEN. Patients receiving TVAR during a live broadcast were compared with a control group using the following criteria; STS ± 2 points, day of the procedure ±4 weeks, same first surgeon and the same access resulting one control group of 46 patients and live stream group of 46 patients. The safety endpoint was evaluated by the rate of major complications: hospital death, stroke, tamponade, embolization, coronary obstruction, renal failure requiring dialysis and need for pacemaker.

No clinical or echocardiographic results from the group live stream versus the control group were observed. The total duration of the procedure was higher in the live broadcast group (129 ± 49 versus 100 ± 42 minutes p = 0.007) but no difference in fluoroscopy time, number of surgeons, intra procedural complications, stay in coronary unit or hospital. The presence of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation was 4.7 % in the live stream group and 9.5 % in the control group without reaching statistical significance. There were no differences in the safety endpoint, death (2.2 % in each group), conversion to surgery, vascular complications, bleeding, arrhythmias, need for pacemaker or dialysis infections.

Conclusion

These data provide support that procedures of percutaneous aortic valve replacement live broadcast for congress made

More articles by this author

TAVR in Bicuspid Valves: Higher Prosthesis Mismatch?

TAVR indication is steadily advancing onto younger, lower risk patients.  The presence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) has been observed in 0.5% to 2% of...

Edge-to-Edge Repair in Central and Non-Central Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common condition, with approximately 3.5% prevalence in individuals under 65, increasing to 7.7% in those over 75. It can...

Is Angioplasty Always Necessary after TAVR?

Courtesy of: Silvina E. Gomez, MD The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing TAVR is high, ranging from 40 to 70%, according...

TAVR and Anticoagulation: What Should We Do?

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has consolidated as a valid strategy for certain groups of patients. However, approximately one third of those who require...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TAVR in Bicuspid Valves: Higher Prosthesis Mismatch?

TAVR indication is steadily advancing onto younger, lower risk patients.  The presence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) has been observed in 0.5% to 2% of...

ROLLER COASTR-EPIC22: Comparison of Plaque Modification Techniques in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

The presence of coronary calcium significantly limits the success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), primarily due to suboptimal stent expansion. This can lead to...

Edge-to-Edge Repair in Central and Non-Central Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common condition, with approximately 3.5% prevalence in individuals under 65, increasing to 7.7% in those over 75. It can...