The higher the bleeding risk, the greater the benefit of radial access in terms of mortality

Original title: Baseline bleeding risk and arterial access site practice in relation to procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. Presenter: Mamas A. Mamas et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1554-1564.

The transradial approach has been associated with reduced access site related bleeding complications as well as a reduced mortality in the context of PCI. It seems reasonable to assume that baseline bleeding risk could also influence the benefit associated to the transradial approach, but it has not yet been established.

This trial studied the relationship between baseline bleeding risk, the transradial approach and post PCI events of all patients included in the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database.

Baseline bleeding risk was calculated with the modified Mehran score in 348689 patients undergoing PCI between the years2006 and 2011. Patients were divided according to score in 4 categories of risk (low <10, moderate 10-14, high 15-19 and very high ≥20). The impact of baseline risk was analyzed on mortality at 30 days, according to access site.

Radial access was associated to a reduction of 35% mortality at 30 days (OR 0.65, IC 95% 0.59 to 0.72; p < 0.0001) and this reduction was associated to baseline bleeding risk (for those with

Conclusion

The transradial approach was independently associated to a reduction of mortality at 30 days and the magnitude of this effect was associated to bleeding risk. PCI patients with higher risk of bleeding are the ones that most benefit from the transradial approach.

Editorial Comment

In this study of the daily practice it was observed that 43% of patients with the lowest bleeding risk received the radial approach and, unexpectedly, only 40% of patients with the highest bleeding risk saw the same benefit. Even though there is enough evidence to adopt the transradial approach in all patients, we should give special attention to those with higher risk of bleeding, risk that should be calculated prior to intervention and should be known by the operator for him to make an informed decision on the most appropriate access site.

SOLACI

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...