Duration of double antiaggregation therapy in patients with oral anticoagulation

Original title: Duration of Triple Therapy in Patients Requiring Oral Anticoagulation After Drug-Eluting Stent ImplantationThe ISAR-TRIPLE Trial. Reference: Katrin A. Fiedler et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(16):1619-1629.

Patients with oral anticoagulation indication after drug eluting stenting require aspirin and clopidogrel; however, the triple scheme has high bleeding risk and optimal duration is yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to assess whether a 6 week scheme of clopidogrel after DES could be associated to a superior net clinical benefit in patients receiving the usual aspirin and oral anticoagulation.

A total of 614 patients receiving DES treated with aspirin and anticoagulation were randomized to 6 weeks of clopidogrel (n=307) vs. 6 months of clopidogrel (n=307). Primary end point was a composite of death, infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke and TIMI major bleeding longer than 9 months

Primary end point happened in 30 patients (9.8%) of the 6 week clopidogrel group and in 27 patients (8.8%) of the 6 month group (HR: 1.14; CI 95% 0.68 to 1.91; p=0.63). Neither were there significant differences when considering ischemic end point (4% vs 4.3%; p=0.87) and TIMI major bleeding (5.3% vs 4%; p=0.44) separately.

Conclusion

Six weeks of triple scheme (aspirin, clopidogrel, oral anticoagulation) after DES implantation was not superior to the 6 month therapy as regards clinical net benefit. This suggests that choosing a short or long scheme should be case by case, according to bleeding/ischemic risk.

Editorial Comment

A study that also wanted to answer this question was one by Dewilde WJ, published at Lancet 2013; in this case, the study variable was not clopidogrel, but aspirin. With a similar number of patients, Dewilde showed a non-significant trend of major bleeding in favor of the clopidogrel/anticoagulation alone vs. the triple scheme. Although all of these studies have been recently opened and are relatively small, there seems to be enough information to use the triple scheme the least possible time and carefully assess the risk/benefit ratio.

SOLACI

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | Protect The Head-To-Head Trial: Randomized Comparison Between Emboliner and Sentinel During TAVI

Ischemic stroke remains one of the most feared complications of TAVI, with a relatively low but persistent incidence of 2–4%, without significant reduction over...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...