Randomized study of bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: DESSOLVE II protocol results

Original title: Randomised study of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: results of the DESSOLVE II trial. Reference: Wijns W EuroIntervention 2015 Apr 22;10(12):1383-90.

Multicenter, randomized study, which enrolled in 26 centers, a total of 184 patients 2:1 (bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent, (SES) [n = 123] versus zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) [n = 61]). All patients were evaluated with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) immediately after stent implantation and at nine months, while a subgroup of patients in both groups were also subjected to evaluation by optical coherence tomography (OCT).

The primary hypothesis of superiority of the work, is evaluating SES over SLZ in “late lumen loss” (LLL). At nine months hypothesis was fulfilled, showing significant differences in SES in LLL values (0.27 ± 0.46 mm versus 0.58 ± 0.41 mm, p <0.001); the percentage of uncovered stent struts at nine months by OCT was very low in both groups, as well as the number of major events and stent thrombosis, with similar results in both groups. 

Conclusion

DESSOLVE II study demonstrated superiority of SES over SLZ regarding the primary objective, demonstrating a significant reduction in late lumen loss (LLL). Also confirms by OCT that the percentage of coverage stent struts is high in both groups at nine months, with a high safety profile of both stents, with low MACE and stent thrombosis.

Editorial comment

There are several limitations of the study: protocol of small dimensions, with a short follow-up so far (planned follow-up to five years), “single-blind” (in this way can create a selection bias towards injuries to treat), with a percentage of patients who underwent OCT without explaining the criteria why some patients were selected, with a “soft” primary endpoint (LLL). Moreover, the treated lesions were simple lesions (A, B1, B2), being complex injuries an exclusion criterion. Despite all this, the goal of superiority was met with SES, and above all, it was possible to show that the safety profile of the device is at least similar to SLZ, with low percentages and acceptable MACE and stent thrombosis (to nine months SES/SLZ 4.3% versus 6.7% and 0.9% versus 1.7%, respectively). Long-term monitoring is pending to draw major conclusions. 

Courtesy of Santiago F. Coroleu MD
Interventional Cardiologist
Instituto de Cardiología de Santiago del Estero (Argentina).

Dr. Santiago F. Coroleu

More articles by this author

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....