Occupational Hazzard in the Cath Lab

Original Title: Occupational Health Risks in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Workers. Reference: Maria Grazia Andreassi et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;9(4).

 

Orthopedic lesions and radiation exposure are among the health risks Cath Lab staff take. However, the potential occupational hazard in quantitative terms is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of health issues among cath lab personnel (interventional cardiology/ electrophysiology) and correlate them with length of exposure.

We used a self-administered questionnaire to collect demographic information, work related information, possible lifestyle confounding factors, medications, and health status. A total of 746 subjects were evaluated, 466 (281 male; 44 ±9 years) exposed and 280 unexposed (179 male; 43±7 years). Exposed personnel included 218 interventional cardiologists and electrophysiologists, 191 nurses and 57 technicians working for a median of 10 years (range 5 to 24 years). In the exposed group, there was a significantly higher rate of skin lesions (P=0.002), orthopedic illness (P<0.001), cataract (P=0.003), hypertension (P=0.02), and hypercholesterolemia (P<0.001) vs. the non-exposed group. In addition, there was a clear gradient unfavorable for exposed physicians over exposed technicians or nurses.

In the exposed physicians, adjusted OR ranged from 1.7 for hypertension (95% CI: 1 to 3; P=0.05), 2.9 for hypercholesterolemia (95% CI: 1–5; P=0.004), 4.5 for cancer (95% CI: 0.9 to 25; P=0.06), and 9 OR for cataract (95% CI: 2 to 41; P=0.004).

Conclusion
Health problems are more frequently observed in cath lab staff than in unexposed staff. These data show the need to spread out the culture of safety in the cath lab across all staff involved.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...