Bivalirudin reduces bleeding rate in carotid stenting

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava

bivalirudina-heparina-anticoagulantesBivalirudin has been shown to reduce bleeding in carotid stenting and maintain its efficacy. Even though carotid stenting has shown benefits, these remain unclear.

 

With this in mind, four studies were analyzed (one randomized) including 7,784 patients undergoing carotid stenting with unfractioned heparin vs. bivalirudin.

 

No difference was found between the groups across the different studies.

 

Bivalirudin was shown to reduce major bleeding rate with a relative risk (RR) of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.35-0.8; I2=0%) and minor bleeding RR of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.2-0.82; I2 =0%), with no difference in ischemic stroke, intracranial bleeding, infraction or mortality at 30 days.

 

Conclusion

Compared to unfractioned heparin, bivalirudin was associated with lower bleeding risk when used in carotid stenting.

 

Comment

The use of bivalirudin has shown this benefit in coronary PCI, but the transradial approach has also shown this benefit in PCI with unfractioned heparin.

 

In addition, bivalirudin significantly increases costs compared to unfractioned heparin.

 

Perhaps the use of the transradial approach (which several studies show as feasible and safe) neutralizes this benefit of bivalirudin, except for those cases that, for several reasons, should be done via femoral.  

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava

 

Original Title: Hemorrhagic and Ischemic Outcomes of Heparin vs. Bivalirudin in Carotid Artery Stenting: A Meta-analysis of Studies.

Reference: Jad Omran, et; al. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention 2017;88:746-753.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

ACC 2026 | FAST III: vFFR vs FFR in physiology-guided revascularization of intermediate coronary lesions

Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions remains a cornerstone in decision-making for coronary revascularization. Although FFR continues to be one of the guideline-recommended references,...