TCT 2019 | IDEAL-LM: Bioabsorbable Polymer DES vs. Permanent Polymer DES for Left Main Stenosis

Courtesy of SBHCI.

This study showed that using the everolimus eluting stent with bioabsorbable polymer Synergy followed by 4 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to treat left main stenosis (LMS) was safe and effective, compared against using the everolimus eluting stent with permanent polymer Xience followed by the conventional 12 months DAPT. 

Highlights TCT 2019

This study presented at the TCT 2019 scientific sessions was carried out in 29 centers in 5 countries, in patients with LMS undergoing PCI randomized 1:1 to Synergy vs Xience. More than one third of patients received the procedure in the context of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and nearly 80% received only one stent.

The study had a non-inferiority design; it looked at death, infarction or ischemia driven revascularization at 2 years. Secondary end points included ischemic and bleeding events.  

It included 818 patients followed at 2 years with primary end point rate resulting 14.6% for the Synergy and 11.4% for Xience (p=0.17). There were no differences in ischemic events, and neither were there differences in thrombosis. The latter is important given that the Synergy arm did not received DAPT between months 4 to 12. Regardless, this did not translate in less major bleeding (BARC 3 to 5) for the Synergy arm.

Conclusion

The IDEAL-LM confirms the good results of both strategies in PCI for patients with left main stenosis.

Courtesy of SBHCI.

Link to the SBHCI publication HERE

ideal-lm-tct2019

Original Title: IDEAL-LM: A Randomized Trial of a Bioabsorbable Polymer DES With 4-Month DAPT vs. a Durable Polymer DES With 12-Month DAPT in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

Author of the Original Title: Robert-Jan Van Geuns.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....