Virtual ACC 2020 | PRECOMBAT: 10 Years for Surgery vs. Angioplasty in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

After 10 years of follow-up, there were no significant differences in the rates of major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events among patients with left main coronary artery disease randomized to angioplasty or surgery. Since this was the first study to randomize patients with left main coronary artery disease to angioplasty or surgery, it enrolled very few patients. As a consequence, it lacks the statistical power to generate definitive conclusions.

The PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) study randomized 300 patients to angioplasty with a sirolimus-eluting stent and another 300 patients to surgery, to treat left main coronary artery disease in 13 Korean hospitals between 2004 and 2009.

The follow-up was extended to 10 years for all patients, with a mean of 11.3.

After this incredibly long period, the primary composite endpoint of death, infarction, stroke, or target vessel revascularization occurred in 29.8% of patients in the angioplasty arm and 24.7% of patients in the surgery arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1.69).


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | Controversial Trial ISCHEMIA Finally in NEJM.


The outcomes are practically identical between strategies once revascularization is excluded (18.2% vs. 17.5%; HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.44).

All-cause death rates were also quite similar (14.5% vs. 13.8%).

The only variable differentiating both strategies at 10 years is, as expected, target vessel revascularization (16.1% vs. 8.0%).

Conclusion

The 10-year follow-up of pioneer study PRECOMBAT shows us similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events among patients with left main coronary artery lesions randomized to angioplasty or surgery.

precombat-10-anos

Original Title: Ten-Year Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Disease. Extended Follow-Up of the PRECOMBAT Trial.

Reference: Duk-Woo Park et al. Circulation 2020; Epub ahead of print y presentado en forma virtual en el ACC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....