Can Ticagrelor Prevent Strokes in High-Risk Patients?

In addition to aspirin, Ticagrelor offers better prognosis in patients that already had a stroke and have a high-risk cardiovascular profile. These benefits should be correctly balanced seeing as they are not free of risk. 

¿Puede el ticagrelor prevenir strokes en pacientes de alto riesgo?

Antiplatelet therapy makes part of the standard treatment of cardiac or cerebrovascular patients. Ticagrelor has shown superior to clopidogrel in the Pivot study, especially thanks to its better safety in terms of bleeding in patients undergoing ACS. 

Thinking all vascular territories present the same physiopathology and that the intervention technique which successfully treats one will equally successfully treat the rest of territories is a fallacy we have fallen for too many times. There are no shortcuts to knowledge: this is why ticagrelor continues to be controversial in strokes and practically incontrovertible in ACS. 

This study recently published in Stroke carried out a systematic search of publications comparing ticagrelor against other P2Y12 receptor antagonist in combination with aspirin or against aspirin monotherapy to treat high risk cardio and cerebrovascular patients (CAD, ACS, strokes, transient ischemic attacks or peripheral vascular disease).   

Efficacy end point was the occurrence of stroke and safety end point was bleeding and all-cause mortality. 

The meta-analysis included 26 randomized studies with a total 124,495 patients. 


Read also: HOST-EXAM: The Study that Challenges Aspirin as Long-Term Antiplatelet Therapy.


Compared against the control groups, ticagrelor combined with aspirin reduced stroke risk by 20%, with results significative (RR 0.80, CI 95%, 0.71 to 0.89). However, people receiving ticagrelor as monotherapy did not show this benefit so clearly (RR 0.88, CI 95%, 0.77 to 1.00; p=0.05).

All studies included a monotherapy branch (aspirin, ticagrelor, clopidogrel, etc.) that showed similar bleeding rate, while any combination increased bleeding by 100% vs. any monotherapy.

The combination of ticagrelor and aspirin did not offer benefits in terms of mortality.

Conclusion

The combination of ticagrelor and aspirin could bring benefits in terms of repeat events for patients with high risk of arteriosclerosis. The benefit of this combination in particular, as well as all other combinations, comes at the cost of increased bleeding, including intracranial bleeding.

Original Title: Network Meta-Analysis of Ticagrelor for Stroke Prevention in Patients at High Risk for Cardiovascular or Cerebrovascular Events.

Reference: Alexandra Bálint et al. Stroke. 2021 Aug;52(9):2809-2816. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032670.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

Ultrathin vs Thin-Strut Stents in PCI Patients at High Bleeding Risk

Several in vivo studies have shown that ultrathin stents present lower thrombogenic risk vs. thin-strut stents, which reflects in lower rates of target lesion...

Should We Withdraw Anticoagulation Before TAVR?

Approximately one-third of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have atrial fibrillation and are on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. This creates a complex...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...