Should Aspirin Be the Standard of Secondary Prevention of MACE?

Much has been published recently on short term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) both in acute (ACS) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) as well as safety of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.

¿Llegó el momento de replantear a la aspirina como la elección en prevención secundaria de MACE?

When discussing secondary prevention in patients with established coronary artery disease, aspirin (ASA) has been the preferred drug for the prevention of new atherothrombotic events. 

This preference is mainly due to insufficient evidence on the risk and benefits of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a period of DAPT.

Inspired by this, researchers carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. ASA monotherapy in the secondary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Efficacy primary end point was the presence of MACE. Safety primary end point was major bleeding. Secondary end points included AMI, stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) and all-cause mortality. 

Read also: WOEST 2 | Dual Versus Triple Antithrombotic Scheme in the Real World. Antiplatelet Therapy. Anticoagulation Scheme.

9 randomized studies were selected including 61623 patients: 5 comparing ASA vs clopidogrel and 4 comparing ASA vs ticagrelor. Most patients presented and an ischemic coronary event (29.9% SCA, 20.1% SCC) or a stroke (39.5%), and one study included patients with a history of cardiovascular disease (CAPRIE). 

Patients on P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy saw 11% MACE reduction, a significant one compared against ASA (RR 0.89, CI95% 0.84-0.95), regardless the kind of P2Y12 inhibitor. MACE reduction was at the expense of AMI (with no difference in stroke or all-cause mortality). Bleeding risk was higher (RR 0.94; CI95%: 0.88-1.30) and any bleeding (RR 1.08; CI95%: 0.88-1.30) was similar. 

Conclusions

This systematic review recently published in the European Heart Journal Open (European Society of Cardiology) has shown, through a meta-analysis, that monotherapy with P2Y12 inhibitors significantly reduced MACE risk by 11% and AMI risk by 19% in the secondary prevention of MACE in antiaggregated patients. This happened regardless of the chosen drug, clopidogrel or ticagrelor, and with no increased bleeding risk. Even though these results had no impact in all-cause mortality, using a P2Y12 inhibitor should be considered as a valid alternative for secondary prevention, according to this research.  

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the editorial board in SOLACI.org .

Original Title: P2Y12 inhibitor versus aspirin monotherapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Source: Aggarwal D, et al. P2Y12 inhibitor versus aspirin monotherapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events: meta-analysis of randomized trials. European Heart Journal Open [Internet]. 2022;2(2). 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

Ultrathin vs Thin-Strut Stents in PCI Patients at High Bleeding Risk

Several in vivo studies have shown that ultrathin stents present lower thrombogenic risk vs. thin-strut stents, which reflects in lower rates of target lesion...

Should We Withdraw Anticoagulation Before TAVR?

Approximately one-third of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have atrial fibrillation and are on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. This creates a complex...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...