Single Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has surged as an effective alternative to treat patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) presenting counterindications for oral anticoagulants. However, the optimal antithrombotic treatment after LAAO is still debated, seeing as it should prevent device related thrombosis (DRT) while minimizing bleeding risk. 

Cierre de orejuela izquierda

The aim of this retrospective study carried out at one single center, was to assess the long term safety and efficacy of the single antiplatelet strategy (SAPT) after LAAO. 

Primary end point was cardiac CT or transesophageal echocardiography presence of DRT 6 to 12 months after intervention. There was an additional end point with clinical variable including transient ischemic attack, intra and extracranial bleeding, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. 

Of a total 553 patients undergoing LAAO, 77% received SAPT as antithrombotic scheme at discharge, aspirin being the most used (72%), followed by clopidogrel (5%). The remaining 22% was discharged with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), anticoagulation with or without antiaggregant, or without antiaggregant. Mean followup was 4.1 years, with mean age 74 approximately and a predominance of men. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores of SAPT patients resulted 3,9 and 3,4 respectively. Fortunately, patients in the SAPT cohort showed a mean CHA2DS2-VASc score higher than 4,4 and a HAS-BLED score lower than 3,0.

Read also: LpA: 30-Year Cardiovascular Followup in Primary Prevention Cohorts.

1,5% of patients showed the primary end point at 8 week followup. Ischemic stroke rate at one year was 2,2% (CI 95%: 1,1-4,2). One-year major bleeding and cardiovascular death rates were 5,9% (CI 95%: 4,0-8,9) and 2,9% (IC: 1,6-5,1), respectively.

Conclusion

This study has revealed that the use of SAPT following LAAO results in comparable rates of stroke and DRT to those of large registries and studies using more intensive antithrombotic schemes. Also, there was a lower rate of major bleeding. The use of SAPT after LAAO seems safe and effective in select patients, even though the strategy requires further assessment. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Single antiplatelet therapy following Amplatzer left atrial appendage occlusion

Reference: Anders Kramer et al EuroIntervention 2024;20:e301-e311.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....