ESC 2024 | AßYSS: Discontinuation of Beta-Blocker Treatment After One Year in Uncomplicated MI

Researchers presented a non-inferiority study conducted at 49 centers in France, with a randomized cohort of stable post-acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients who were more than 6 months past the acute event and were on chronic beta-blocker treatment, with an ejection fraction ≥40%. The primary objective of the study was to assess the occurrence of death, MI, stroke, and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes.

The study included 3700 randomized patients with an average follow-up of 3 years. The primary endpoint occurred in 21.1% of patients who continued beta-blockers, compared to 23.8% of those who discontinued the treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.33; p for non-inferiority = 0.44).

There were no differences in quality of life between the randomized groups (mean difference of 0.002).

Read also: Long Term Outcomes of OCT Guided PCI in STEMI patients.

Results showed that discontinuation of beta-blocker therapy was not non-inferior to continuation regarding the pre-established composite endpoint. Additionally, there were increases in blood pressure, resting heart rate, and hospitalizations in the group that discontinued treatment.

Presented by Johanne Silvain at the Hot-Line Sessions, ESC Congress 2024, August 30-September 2, London, England.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....