ESC 2024 | AßYSS: Discontinuation of Beta-Blocker Treatment After One Year in Uncomplicated MI

Researchers presented a non-inferiority study conducted at 49 centers in France, with a randomized cohort of stable post-acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients who were more than 6 months past the acute event and were on chronic beta-blocker treatment, with an ejection fraction ≥40%. The primary objective of the study was to assess the occurrence of death, MI, stroke, and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes.

The study included 3700 randomized patients with an average follow-up of 3 years. The primary endpoint occurred in 21.1% of patients who continued beta-blockers, compared to 23.8% of those who discontinued the treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.33; p for non-inferiority = 0.44).

There were no differences in quality of life between the randomized groups (mean difference of 0.002).

Read also: Long Term Outcomes of OCT Guided PCI in STEMI patients.

Results showed that discontinuation of beta-blocker therapy was not non-inferior to continuation regarding the pre-established composite endpoint. Additionally, there were increases in blood pressure, resting heart rate, and hospitalizations in the group that discontinued treatment.

Presented by Johanne Silvain at the Hot-Line Sessions, ESC Congress 2024, August 30-September 2, London, England.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

ROLLER COASTR-EPIC22: Comparison of Plaque Modification Techniques in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

The presence of coronary calcium significantly limits the success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), primarily due to suboptimal stent expansion. This can lead to...

Early and Late Outcomes with the ABSORB Bioresorbable Scaffold

Coronary angioplasty with drug-eluting stents (DES) is associated with a 2-3% annual incidence of stent-related events, a risk that has not significantly decreased despite...

Is Angioplasty Always Necessary after TAVR?

Courtesy of: Silvina E. Gomez, MD The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing TAVR is high, ranging from 40 to 70%, according...

TAVR and Anticoagulation: What Should We Do?

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has consolidated as a valid strategy for certain groups of patients. However, approximately one third of those who require...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TAVR in Bicuspid Valves: Higher Prosthesis Mismatch?

TAVR indication is steadily advancing onto younger, lower risk patients.  The presence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) has been observed in 0.5% to 2% of...

ROLLER COASTR-EPIC22: Comparison of Plaque Modification Techniques in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

The presence of coronary calcium significantly limits the success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), primarily due to suboptimal stent expansion. This can lead to...

Edge-to-Edge Repair in Central and Non-Central Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common condition, with approximately 3.5% prevalence in individuals under 65, increasing to 7.7% in those over 75. It can...