TCT 2025 | INFINITY–SWEDEHEART: Long-Term Outcomes of the Bioadaptive Coronary Implant Versus Drug-Eluting Stent

The bioadaptive coronary implant DynamX (Elixir Medical, California) was developed to restore normal vascular function after angioplasty, combining a cobalt-chromium helical structure with bioresorbable connectors that, upon degradation after six months, allow the vessel to regain its pulsatility and adaptive response.

The INFINITY–SWEDEHEART trial was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study conducted across 20 centers in Sweden. It compared the sirolimus-eluting bioadaptor to a reference everolimus-eluting stent (Resolute Onyx). A total of 2,400 patients were enrolled (1,201 bioadaptor; 1,198 DES) in a 1:1 randomization design.

The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months, with the objective of demonstrating non-inferiority. Statistically powered secondary endpoints included TLF, target vessel failure (TVF), and TLF in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients between 6 and 24 months.

At two years, the bioadaptor demonstrated a 48% reduction in TLF between 6 and 24 months compared with DES (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29–0.93; p = 0.027). A significant improvement was also observed in TVF (p = 0.0481), with an even greater benefit among ACS patients (p = 0.0175).

Read also: TCT 2025 | SUMMIT-MAC: Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement with the Tendyne System in Patients with Severe Annular Calcification.

The reduction in events was consistent across all components of the composite endpoint — cardiac death, target-vessel MI, and revascularization — with no increase in thrombosis, device-related complications, or major adverse events.

Conclusions

The DynamX bioadaptive stent showed a sustained reduction in device-related events from 6 to 24 months, with particularly pronounced benefits in ACS patients. It is the first device to demonstrate significant improvement over contemporary drug-eluting stents, establishing a new paradigm in coronary intervention by combining safety, efficacy, and functional vessel restoration.

Presented by David Erlinge on behalf of the INFINITY–SWEDEHEART Investigators. TCT 2025 (Late-Breaking Clinical Trials), October 27, San Francisco, USA.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....