Perforation Management in Bifurcations: Bench Testing of Bailout with Covered Stents

Coronary perforations during PCI are one of the most dreaded complications in interventional cardiology, especially in bifurcations. Though rate, this critical situation requires an immediate response and the use of covered stents has been shown effective and safe for rupture sealing. 

However, when there is a perforation at bifurcation level with relevant side branch jailing, there are additional technical challenges. There is limited data available, with isolated case reports and no systematized, clearly defined strategy. 

The study presented by Hemetsberger et al. addresses this gap by bench testing the viability of different side branch recanalization and reconstruction techniques after covered stent implantation. 

Using silicone models with standard 70° bifurcations, four perforation and bailout scenarios were simulated:

  • Main branch covered stent crossover with side branch exclusion
  • Side branch ostium optimization with culotte technique using a DES
  • Covered stent implantation both in main and side branches
  • Final optimization with DES after implantation of two covered stents

Read also: EMERALD II: Non-Invasive Coronary Anatomy and Physiology (CCTA) in ACS Prediction.

To cross the stent membrane, tip load wires were used (≥12 g) and an angulated micro-catheter (Supercross 120°). Post intervention morphologic assessment was done using optical coherence tomography and angioscopy.

These techniques were successfully implemented in all experimental models. High tip-load wires allowed effective cover penetration in less than 60 seconds (Confianza Pro 12 and Infiltrac Plus 14). Simple fenestration generated overhang material towards side branch ostium, with approximately 25% lumen reduction, a situation effectively corrected with additional DES implantation using the Culotte technique, improving lumen area by at least 8%. Similar results were observed in the main branch after DES optimization following dual covered stent implantation.

Conclusions

This bench test has shown that when managing coronary perforations in bifurcations with side branch exclusion, flow restitution is technically feasible using tip-load wires and optimizing outcomes with drug eluting stent techniques, such as culotte. Even though these are lab scenarios, the observed technical feasibility suggests potential clinical application in emergency contexts. 

Original Title: Bench Testing Analysis of Perforation Management in the Setting of Bifurcation Coronary Intervention.

Reference: Hemetsberger R, Maaroufi A, Hamzaraj K, Andreka J, Abdelghani M, Farhan S, Lootz D, Gollmer J, Mankerious N, Hengstenberg C, Johnson TW, Toth GG. Bench Testing Analysis of Perforation Management in the Setting of Bifurcation Coronary Intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Dec 12. doi: 10.1002/ccd.70406. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41387216.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...