First results of bioabsorbable metal scaffolds DREAMS

Original title: Safety and performance of the drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold (DREAMS) in patients with de-novo coronary lesions: 12 month results of the prospective, multicentre, first-in-man BIOSOLVE-I trial. Reference: Michael Haude et al. Lancet 2013; 381: 836–44.

Bioabsorbable scaffolds could improve vasomotion, remodelling and facilitate new interventions, both percutaneous and surgical. This new bioabsorbable scaffold, different from the existent polymeric absorbable DES, is metallic (magnesium alloy) and therefore, intuitively, its mechanic performance would be similar to that of conventional stents.

This first-in-man trial tested the safety and efficacy of the magnesium-based paclitaxel-eluting absorbable metal scaffold (DREAMS, Biotronik, Bülach, Switzerland) in symptomatic patients with de novo coronary lesions. Primary end point was target vessel failure at 6 to 12 months (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization). The study enrolled 46 patients with up to 2 lesions in separate vessels with 3 and 3.5 mm reference diameter,

At 12 months, 3 patients (7%) reached the primary end point and clinically driven target lesion was revascularized in 2 of them; there were no deaths or scaffold thrombosis. Late lumen loss at 12 months (0.52 mm) was lower than at 6 months (0.65 mm), though the difference is not significant. Vessel angulation was completely reestablished at 12 months.

Conclusion: 

The study shows the DREAMS bioabsorbable scaffold angiographic and clinical safety and efficacy at 12 months. This scaffold could be an alternative to the polymeric absorbable scaffold.

Editorial comment: 

Despite the fact that target lesion failure rate with DREAMS was similar to the rates obtained with contemporary DES and everolimus eluting scaffolds, late lumen loss was not comparable. This study was the first-in-man trial to test this scaffold and will undoubtedly lead to better versions before it becomes available to the clinical practitioners.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...