Result of bifurcated devices to protect the internal iliac in aorto-iliac aneurysms

Original title: Endovascular Treatment of Aorto-iliac Aneurysms: Four-year Results of Iliac Branch Endograft. Reference: G. Pratesi et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jun;45(6):607-9.

Iliac bifurcated devices have proven to be effective in treating common iliac aneurysms but the findings are based on small series, generally from a sole center experience. This multicenter registry included 85 patients with aorto-iliac aneurysms who received bifurcated devices, (most of them, Zenith Bifurcated Iliac sidebranch, Cook, Bloomington, IN, USA). Technical success was achieved in 98.7% with no perioperative mortality. The only case that could not be implanted was probably due to a very challenging anatomy.

During the first 30 days only a single occlusion of iliac branch was observed and at follow-up CT scan, three patients (3.7%) had distal type I endoleak. These patients were managed conservatively with strict surveillance protocol but thus far showed no sac growth. At follow-up (20.4 ± 15.4), seven unrelated deaths occurred leaving an estimated 24-month survival of 89.5% and 76.7% after 48 months. During follow-up there were no aneurysm-related deaths, need for conversion to conventional surgery or aneurysmatic rupture. No new branch thrombosis was registered.  

Seven patients (8.6%) progressed with buttock claudication, six of them were bilateral iliac aneurysms cases where one hypogastric was protected with a bifurcated branch and the other was embolized. The symptoms were always confined to the side of the embolized hypogastric and did not improve with time. 

Conclusion:

Iliac bifurcated devices were effective in preserving the internal iliac artery implant in the context of an abdominal aortic stent. This represents a valid technique in the case of bilateral iliac aneurysms. 

Commentary:

All patients who developed a distal type I endoleak had an ectatic internal iliac artery. Perhaps the compromise of this artery by the common iliac aneurysm should be considered as a limitation of the technique.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

A New Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Paradigm? CREST-2 Trial Unified Results

Severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis continues to be controversial seeing the optimization of intensive medical therapy (IMT) and the availability lower periprocedural risk revascularization techniques....

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...