Contrast-induced nephropathy in the context of PCI, a lot more frequent in women

Original title: Female gender and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary percutaneous intervention for ST-segment elevatio myocardial infarction. Reference: Stefano Lucreziotti, et al. International Journal of Cardiology 2014;174:37-42

 

Primary PCI has been demonstrated beneficial. However, it is associated to greater contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) with increased in hospital and long term morbidity and mortality. In addition, several reports have shown women evolve worse after this complication, compared to men. This study analyzed post primary PCI serum creatinine increase in 323 patients.

Baseline was defined as 1.2 mg/dl and CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (≥25% or ≥0.5mg/dl) from baseline during the first 72 hrs. 63% of the general population had a Mehran risk score (MRS) ≥6. Compared to men, women were of older age, had a higher MRS, lower renal function and longer symptom to reperfusion time.  CIN predictors included female gender, older age, reduced LV ejection function, preexisting kidney failure and high MRS. The multivariable analysis associated female gender and reduced LV ejection fraction to CIN.

In-hospital mortality was higher in patients developing CIN (20.4% vs. 2.6%;  p<0.001), in women (9.3% vs. 3.5%; p=0.02) and in patients with reduced ventricular function (36.7% vs. 2%; p=0.001). The study also divided the population in two groups according to MRS 6, and showed higher mortality in patients with >6 (1.9% vs. 11.3% p<0.001).

Conclusion

In primary PCI, female gender and reduced LVEF are associated to contrast induced nephropathy. This complication is an independent predictor of in-hospital and long term mortality. 

Editorial Comment

This analysis shows that, in patients undergoing primary PCI, female gender is an independent predictor of CIN, associated to poor clinical outcomes. This may be due to the fact that females were of older age, had a higher MRS, lower renal function and longer symptom to reperfusion time. 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava
Interventional Cardiologist
Favaloro Foundation
Buenos  Aires

Dr. Carlos Fava para SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...