Percutaneous treatment of aortic coarctation with self-expandable uncovered nitinol stent

Original title: Percutaneous treatment of adult isthmic aortic coarctation: acute and long-term clinical and imaging outcome with a self-expandable uncovered nitinol stent. Reference: Kische S et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1).

 

The aim of this study was to show perioperative and long term results of the percutaneous treatment of aortic coarctation with the self-expandable uncovered nitinol stent (Sinus-XL, Optimed, Esslingen, Germany).

A total of 52 consecutive patients were treated with this device. Mean age was 36.6 and peak invasive trans-coarctation was 54.7±9.9 mm Hg. All patients presented upper body hypertension unresponsive to medical treatment.

Mean stent diameter was 24.2 mm (22-28mm) and mean length was 70.4 mm (40-80 mm). 8 patients required pre dilatation (15.4%) and post dilatation with noncompliant balloon. Postoperative peak gradient was 3.3 ± 2.5 mm Hg, significantly reduced compared to preoperative peak gradient (p<0.001). All patients were discharged at 3.5 days, in average. At 47.6 month follow up, a patients died for non-cardiovascular cause. 

Aortic computed tomography confirmed the absence of stent collapse and migration, as well as the stability of the maximum aortic diameter obtained immediately after procedure. More than half of patients (57.7%) were completely weaned-off antihypertensive medications and the rest used significantly less, with an ankle-brachial pressure index increase from 75 to 0.98 (p<0.001).

Conclusion

The treatment of aortic coarctation in adult patients with a self-expandable uncovered stent is safe and durable. Stent design maintains an adequate radial strength over time with minimal trauma to the aortic wall and no stent-related complications. Hypertension control is immediate and persists over time. 

Editorial Comment

In many countries, this kind of treatment is done with PTFE covered self-expandable balloon stents to prevent rupture after dilation of coarctation, which has not happened to any patient enrolled in this trial, so far. Perhaps, the fact that the device used is self-expandable allows a more controlled dilation and prevents complications. 

SOLACI

More articles by this author

Embolization of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices: Predictors, Prevention, and Management Strategies

Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke and, in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure represents an...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

ACC 2026 | FAST III: vFFR vs FFR in physiology-guided revascularization of intermediate coronary lesions

Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions remains a cornerstone in decision-making for coronary revascularization. Although FFR continues to be one of the guideline-recommended references,...