Duration of double antiaggregation therapy in patients with oral anticoagulation

Original title: Duration of Triple Therapy in Patients Requiring Oral Anticoagulation After Drug-Eluting Stent ImplantationThe ISAR-TRIPLE Trial. Reference: Katrin A. Fiedler et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(16):1619-1629.

Patients with oral anticoagulation indication after drug eluting stenting require aspirin and clopidogrel; however, the triple scheme has high bleeding risk and optimal duration is yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to assess whether a 6 week scheme of clopidogrel after DES could be associated to a superior net clinical benefit in patients receiving the usual aspirin and oral anticoagulation.

A total of 614 patients receiving DES treated with aspirin and anticoagulation were randomized to 6 weeks of clopidogrel (n=307) vs. 6 months of clopidogrel (n=307). Primary end point was a composite of death, infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke and TIMI major bleeding longer than 9 months

Primary end point happened in 30 patients (9.8%) of the 6 week clopidogrel group and in 27 patients (8.8%) of the 6 month group (HR: 1.14; CI 95% 0.68 to 1.91; p=0.63). Neither were there significant differences when considering ischemic end point (4% vs 4.3%; p=0.87) and TIMI major bleeding (5.3% vs 4%; p=0.44) separately.

Conclusion

Six weeks of triple scheme (aspirin, clopidogrel, oral anticoagulation) after DES implantation was not superior to the 6 month therapy as regards clinical net benefit. This suggests that choosing a short or long scheme should be case by case, according to bleeding/ischemic risk.

Editorial Comment

A study that also wanted to answer this question was one by Dewilde WJ, published at Lancet 2013; in this case, the study variable was not clopidogrel, but aspirin. With a similar number of patients, Dewilde showed a non-significant trend of major bleeding in favor of the clopidogrel/anticoagulation alone vs. the triple scheme. Although all of these studies have been recently opened and are relatively small, there seems to be enough information to use the triple scheme the least possible time and carefully assess the risk/benefit ratio.

SOLACI

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | VANISH2 Trial

Cardiac defibrillator implants (CDIs) have been shown to improve survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, approximately one third of...

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

AHA 2024 – BPROAD

Hypertension (elevated blood pressure, BP) is the most common comorbidity among diabetic patients and has been associated with higher cardiovascular risk, though as a...

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...