Duration of double antiaggregation therapy in patients with oral anticoagulation

Original title: Duration of Triple Therapy in Patients Requiring Oral Anticoagulation After Drug-Eluting Stent ImplantationThe ISAR-TRIPLE Trial. Reference: Katrin A. Fiedler et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(16):1619-1629.

Patients with oral anticoagulation indication after drug eluting stenting require aspirin and clopidogrel; however, the triple scheme has high bleeding risk and optimal duration is yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to assess whether a 6 week scheme of clopidogrel after DES could be associated to a superior net clinical benefit in patients receiving the usual aspirin and oral anticoagulation.

A total of 614 patients receiving DES treated with aspirin and anticoagulation were randomized to 6 weeks of clopidogrel (n=307) vs. 6 months of clopidogrel (n=307). Primary end point was a composite of death, infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke and TIMI major bleeding longer than 9 months

Primary end point happened in 30 patients (9.8%) of the 6 week clopidogrel group and in 27 patients (8.8%) of the 6 month group (HR: 1.14; CI 95% 0.68 to 1.91; p=0.63). Neither were there significant differences when considering ischemic end point (4% vs 4.3%; p=0.87) and TIMI major bleeding (5.3% vs 4%; p=0.44) separately.

Conclusion

Six weeks of triple scheme (aspirin, clopidogrel, oral anticoagulation) after DES implantation was not superior to the 6 month therapy as regards clinical net benefit. This suggests that choosing a short or long scheme should be case by case, according to bleeding/ischemic risk.

Editorial Comment

A study that also wanted to answer this question was one by Dewilde WJ, published at Lancet 2013; in this case, the study variable was not clopidogrel, but aspirin. With a similar number of patients, Dewilde showed a non-significant trend of major bleeding in favor of the clopidogrel/anticoagulation alone vs. the triple scheme. Although all of these studies have been recently opened and are relatively small, there seems to be enough information to use the triple scheme the least possible time and carefully assess the risk/benefit ratio.

SOLACI

More articles by this author

Spontaneous Left Main Dissection: Clinical Characteristics, management and Outcomes

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Spontaneous left main dissection in an uncommon, and potentially life-threatening, cause of acute MI. The aim of this study,...

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Spontaneous Left Main Dissection: Clinical Characteristics, management and Outcomes

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Spontaneous left main dissection in an uncommon, and potentially life-threatening, cause of acute MI. The aim of this study,...

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...