Current hemodialysis patients show similar results for sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel

Original title: Drug-eluting stents in patients on chronic haemodialysis: Paclitaxel-eluting stents vs. limus –eluting stents Reference: Gabriel l. Sardi, et al. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2014 Mar;15(2):86-91.

End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) including renal failure on hemodialysis is associated with coronary heart disease and diabetes with subsequent need for revascularization that in this special population has a high rate of restenosis and mortality. In this study 218 patients with ESRD on HDA and CHD of which 156 received sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or everolimus (EES) and 62 patients who received paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) were included. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction and revascularization at 2 years and the secondary end point was the target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 2 years also. The average age of the population was 67 years and 71% were diabetic (39 % requiring insulin).

There was no difference in the primary end point at two years (PES 62.7 % versus SES/EES 58.3 %, p = 0.59). Numerically, both TLR and death were half in the PES group at one and two years but did not reach statistical significance (6.8 % versus 12.4 %, p = 0.24 and 11.1% versus 25.8 %, p = 0.06 respectively). A TLR analysis -adjusted by mortality rate, was performed, showing the benefit of PES disappears and diabetes was the only predictor of TLR at 2 years. The insulin requirement was not a TLR predictor. 

Conclusion

Hemodialysis patients have a high rate of target lesion revascularization despite the use of drug-eluting stents. The use of paclitaxel – eluting stents showed no significant advantage over releasing limus in this population.

Comment

This study shows that results of the PES and SES/EES in patients on HAD is similar (unlike previous studies that favored PES) even with a high rate of death and restenosis. Perhaps bio absorbable stents have a role in improving outcomes or decreased re-interventions. 

Courtesy Dr. Carlos Fava
Interventional cardiologist
Fundación Favaloro – Buenos Aires

Dr. Carlos Fava para SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Download the Official SOLACI-CACI 2024 Congress APP

  DOWNLOAD THE OFFICIAL APP OF SOLACI-CACI 2024 Next Wednesday marks the beginning of SOLACI-CACI 2024! Download the Congress APP and discover the unmissable program of the...

Survey on Hemodynamics Centers in Latin America – SOLACI, Stent Save a Life! and South American Society of Cardiology Initiative

The treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Latin America is highly diverse. There are notable differences between countries and even among regions...

SOLACI-SBHCI 2023 Congress Has Begun!

Let the best begin! After a year of intense work, SOLACI-SBHCI 2023 Congress—the widest, most important event for interventional cardiologists in Latin America—has kicked...

SOLACI-SBHCI 2023 Congress Has Begun!

Let the best begin! After a year of intense work, SOLACI-SBHCI 2023 Congress—the widest, most important event for interventional cardiologists in Latin America—has kicked...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...