ARCTIC-INTERRUPTION: 1 years versus 2 years of double anti-platelet

This study randomized 1259 patients to receive one year versus 2 years of double anti anti-platelet after implantation of a drug-eluting stent. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and urgent revascularization that were equivalent between the two schemes. There was a trend to a higher rate of bleeding in those receiving anti platelet  for 2 years.

3_gilles_montalescot
Gilles Montalescot
2013-10-31

Original title: ARCTIC-INTERRUPTION: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Two Years vs. One Year of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After PCI

More articles by this author

TRANSLATE-POPS: Routine measurement of platelet aggregation generates a minimal impact on the treatment setting

The high platelet reactivity is associated with adverse events after stent implantation. Current guidelines consider the measurement of aggregability as a class IIB and...

TATORT-NSTEMI: Routinely thromboaspiration in patients with non ST-elevation AMI

Thromboaspiration in patients with ST-elevation is being questioned while in patients without elevation this strategy has not been studied. The study included 440 patients...

REPRISE II: LOTUS valve for percutaneous aortic valve replacement

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new device in patients with severe aortic stenosis at high...

GIANT: Evaluation of the genetic profile of CYP2C19 in patients undergoing primary angioplasty

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact resistance thienopyridines through genetic analysis of CYP2C19 receptor. The primary endpoint was  a...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...