ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE: Monoclonal antibody alirocumab vs. ezetimibe in patients with statin intolerance

Statin intolerance limits patients’ capacity to reach their LDL goals. This study compared the new drug alirocumab vs. ezetimibe in patients with statin intolerance and muscular symptoms (≥2 statin intolerance at minimum doses). Study design included placebo administration and statin intolerance testing. LDL baseline was 194 mg/dl.

Conclusion

Alirocumab reduced LDL levels significantly compared to ezetimibe after 24 weeks in a statin intolerant population with high baseline LDL levels. In addition, it showed a much lower tolerance rate compared to atorvastatin

2_patrick_moriarty
Patrick M Moriarty
2014-11-18

Original title: Efficacy And Safety of the Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/kexin Type 9 Monoclonal Antibody, Alirocumab, versus Ezetimibe, in Patients With Statin Intolerance as Defined by a Placebo Run-in and Statin Rechallenge Arm.

More articles by this author

IMPROVE-IT Trial: Finally the association of ezetimibe and simvastatin reduces events vs. simvastatin monotherapy

This is a multicenter, randomized, double blind study designed to test the hypothesis that the combination of ezetimibe and simvastatin improves outcomes compared to...

FACTOR 64: Routine coronary CT angiography in patients at high risk for heart disease.

Article 900 patients with asymptomatic diabetes mellitus were randomized to CT angiography vs. Standard management. Primary end point was a combination of death, infarction and...

Low doses of aspirin for primary prevention in elderly patients with multiple risk factors.

Article The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of low doses of aspirin (AAS) for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in Japanese...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | Protect The Head-To-Head Trial: Randomized Comparison Between Emboliner and Sentinel During TAVI

Ischemic stroke remains one of the most feared complications of TAVI, with a relatively low but persistent incidence of 2–4%, without significant reduction over...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...