ROMA II RELOAD: Additional charge of statin (rosuvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 80 mg within 24 hours of procedure) in patients on whom elective angioplasty is performed.

ROMA II RELOAD multicenter study (General Hospital Umberto I, University of Rome, Rome, Italy) assessed the impact of an additional charge of statin in patients undergoing elective angioplasty. All patients received a rosuvastatin dose of 40 mg (GR) or atorvastatin 80 mg (GA) within 24 hours of the procedure. The primary endpoint of the study was the CK-MB elevation rate of ≥ 3 above normal values (myonecrosis) at 12 and 24 hours post-procedure. Several studies have shown that the enzyme elevation or myonecrosis after angioplasty occurs in 30% of cases and this elevation is associated with a worse outcome at follow-up. Previously, researchers of this study reported that a 40 mg rosuvastatin dose, periprocedural in patients without prior treatment with statins, reduced myonecrosis occurrence. It should be noted that in this study, ROME II RELOAD, chronic intake of statins before procedure was an inclusion criterion and this was not interrupted by the study. Researchers included in their analysis a third group or control group, consisting of patients on chronic statin angioplasty treatment but who were excluded from randomization. At 12 and 24 hours, myonecrosis occurred in similar frequency in the groups treated with rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. (12 h: 7.1% vs. GR. 6.1% GA, p = NS) (24 h: 8.9% vs. GR. 8.3% GA, p = NS). On the other hand, myonecrosis was more frequent in the control group at 12 hours (25%, p = 0.0001) and 24 h (29.1%, p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Atorvastatin charge using 80 mg or rosuvastatin 40 mg have similar efficacy in reducing myonecrosis.

sardella-roma-ii
Gennaro Sardella
2012-05-17

More articles by this author

CIBELES: Xience V comparative study vs Cypher for the treatment of total chronic occlusions.

Spanish-Portuguese multicentre CIBELES study (Raul Moreno, Madrid, Spain) compared two drug-eluting stents - an everolimus (Xience V, Abbott Vascular, USA) and a sirolimus-releasing eluting...

EVOLUTION: Comparative study of non-inferiority of two sirolimus eluting stents: One with permanent polymer and the other with degradable polymer.

The EVOLUTION study, (Dr. Junbo Ge, Shanghai Institute, China), compared two sirolimus-eluting stents, one with permanent polymer (Cypher Select, Cordis Corporation, Miami Lakes, Florida,...

SORT OUT V: Comparison of drug-eluting stents: One with degradable polymer releasing biolimus and the other a permanent polymer sirolimus stent.

SORT OUT V randomized trial (Odense University Hospital, Denmark) compared Nobori stent, a drug-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer eluting biolimus, versus CYPHER a drug-eluting...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...