ROMA II RELOAD: Additional charge of statin (rosuvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 80 mg within 24 hours of procedure) in patients on whom elective angioplasty is performed.

ROMA II RELOAD multicenter study (General Hospital Umberto I, University of Rome, Rome, Italy) assessed the impact of an additional charge of statin in patients undergoing elective angioplasty. All patients received a rosuvastatin dose of 40 mg (GR) or atorvastatin 80 mg (GA) within 24 hours of the procedure. The primary endpoint of the study was the CK-MB elevation rate of ≥ 3 above normal values (myonecrosis) at 12 and 24 hours post-procedure. Several studies have shown that the enzyme elevation or myonecrosis after angioplasty occurs in 30% of cases and this elevation is associated with a worse outcome at follow-up. Previously, researchers of this study reported that a 40 mg rosuvastatin dose, periprocedural in patients without prior treatment with statins, reduced myonecrosis occurrence. It should be noted that in this study, ROME II RELOAD, chronic intake of statins before procedure was an inclusion criterion and this was not interrupted by the study. Researchers included in their analysis a third group or control group, consisting of patients on chronic statin angioplasty treatment but who were excluded from randomization. At 12 and 24 hours, myonecrosis occurred in similar frequency in the groups treated with rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. (12 h: 7.1% vs. GR. 6.1% GA, p = NS) (24 h: 8.9% vs. GR. 8.3% GA, p = NS). On the other hand, myonecrosis was more frequent in the control group at 12 hours (25%, p = 0.0001) and 24 h (29.1%, p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Atorvastatin charge using 80 mg or rosuvastatin 40 mg have similar efficacy in reducing myonecrosis.

sardella-roma-ii
Gennaro Sardella
2012-05-17

More articles by this author

CIBELES: Xience V comparative study vs Cypher for the treatment of total chronic occlusions.

Spanish-Portuguese multicentre CIBELES study (Raul Moreno, Madrid, Spain) compared two drug-eluting stents - an everolimus (Xience V, Abbott Vascular, USA) and a sirolimus-releasing eluting...

EVOLUTION: Comparative study of non-inferiority of two sirolimus eluting stents: One with permanent polymer and the other with degradable polymer.

The EVOLUTION study, (Dr. Junbo Ge, Shanghai Institute, China), compared two sirolimus-eluting stents, one with permanent polymer (Cypher Select, Cordis Corporation, Miami Lakes, Florida,...

SORT OUT V: Comparison of drug-eluting stents: One with degradable polymer releasing biolimus and the other a permanent polymer sirolimus stent.

SORT OUT V randomized trial (Odense University Hospital, Denmark) compared Nobori stent, a drug-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer eluting biolimus, versus CYPHER a drug-eluting...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...