Retrograde Technique: High Success Rate in CTO

Original Title: Outcomes With the Use of the Retrograde Approach for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions in a Contemporary Multicenter US Registry.

Reference: Dimitri Karmpaliotis et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6).

 

Retrograde Technique CTOThis study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the retrograde technique for chronic total occlusions. Researchers compared retrograde vs. anterograde technique outcomes in 1,301 procedures from 11 experienced centers across the US between the years 2012 and 2015.

Population mean age was 65.5±10 years with high diabetes prevalence (45%) and prior MI revascularization surgery (34%).

Globally, technical success was 90%, which reflects the experience of these centers, and major cardiovascular adverse events rate was 2.4%.

The retrograde technique was used in 539 cases (41%), both as initial strategy (46%) and after a failed anterograde attempt (54%).

Comparing both techniques, the retrograde technique was used in more complex cases, both from the clinical (prior surgery 48% vs. 24%; p<0.001) and angiographic point of views (mean Japan CTO score 3.1±1.0 vs 2.1±1.2; p<0.001) and resulted in lower technical success (85% vs. 94%; p<0.001) and higher complications rate (4.3% vs 1.1%; p<0.001).

Multivariable analyzis showed that the presence of suitable collaterals, no prior CABG and the left anterior descending artery as target vessel were success predictors for the retrograde technique.

Conclusion

The retrograde approach is commonly used in the daily contemporary practice especially on most challenging lesions and patients. Despite lower success and higher complications rates compared to the anterograde technique, it is an essential tool to maintain high success rates in chronic total occlusions.

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or suggestions here below.

More articles by this author

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation with a Self-Expanding Valve: Outcomes at 3 Years

Pulmonary regurgitation (PR) is a common condition in patients who have undergone surgical repair of Tetralogy of Fallot or other pathologies involving the right...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...