ABSORV at Long Term in Daily Practice Lesions

absorv abbottThis work reports one year outcomes of the BVS Expand registry. Multiple studies have shown the safety and feasibility of the everolimus eluting bioresorbable scaffold ABSORB (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California), but medium and long term data are limited and only on simple lesions.

 

This is a prospective single-center registry assessing ABSORB performance in lesions representative of the daily practice, such as:

  • Calcified lesions
  • Total occlusions
  • Long lesions
  • Small vessels

 

Inclusion criteria were patients presenting with non ST elevation MI, stable or unstable angina or silent ischemia caused by de novo stenotic lesions in native coronary arteries.

 

Primary end point were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as a composite of:

  • Cardiac death
  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Target vessel revascularization

 

Between September 2012 and January 2015, 249 patients with 335 lesions were included. The mean number of scaffolds per patient was 1.79 ± 1.15. Invasive imaging was used for scaffold implantation in 39% of patients.

 

Mean follow up was 622 days (376 a 734). Using Kaplan-Meier, at 18 months:

  • MACE rate was 6.8%.
  • Cardiac death rate was 1.8%.
  • AMI rate was 5.2%.
  • Target lesion revascularization rate was 4.0%. Scaffold definite thrombosis rate was 1.9%.

 

Conclusion

In complex patients and lesions, the ABSORB resorbable scaffold showed acceptable performance at long term. There were no cases of early thrombosis.

 

Original Title: Mid- to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated With the Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold. The BVS Expand Registry.

Reference: Cordula M. Felix et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9(16):1652-1663.

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your thoughts, comments, questions or suggestions here below.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....