Incomplete Revascularization: Increased Events Rate in Non-Cardiac Surgery?

Incomplete RevascularizationThe aim of this study was to determine whether incomplete revascularization is associated to higher adverse events risk and acute myocardial infarction in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

 

Coronary artery disease patients or patients with prior PCI often have non cardiac surgery. These patients may have had all obstructions treated before surgery (complete revascularization) or only a few (incomplete revascularization).

 

Incomplete revascularization was defined as any ≥50% residual stenosis in the left main, or ≥70% residual stenosis in any epicardial coronary artery based on visual estimate.

 

A total of 4,332 patients (34.7%) arrived to non-cardiac surgery with incomplete revascularization; there were 567 major adverse events within the first month after surgery.

 

Patients with incomplete revascularization showed a 19% increase in post-operative events risk, compared to those with complete revascularization.

 

Among end point components, perioperative MI contributed with most events, and was 37% more frequent in the incomplete revascularization group.

 

After variable adjusting, there was significant interaction between the moment of PCI and events, after non cardiac surgery. Incomplete revascularization was associated with significant increased risk of perioperative MI when surgery was done within 6 weeks of PCI (odds ratio: 1.84; CI 95%: 1.04 to 2.38).

 

The number of vessels with incomplete revascularization was also associated with increased risk of perioperative MI; for each vessel with incomplete revascularization, MI risk increases 17%.

 

Conclusion

Incomplete revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease was associated to an increased risk in MI after non-cardiac surgery.

 

Original Title: Incomplete Revascularization Is Associated with an Increased Risk for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Among Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.

Reference: Ehrin J. Armstrong et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 27;10(4):329-338.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...