Why We Should Use IVUS in Complex Coronary Lesions

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

IVUS in Complex Coronary LesionsDrug eluting stents (DES) have shown benefits in terms of restenosis vs. conventional bare metal stents (BMS). Many of the advantages of DES depend on correct implantation, especially in complex lesions.

 

In complex lesions, the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides important information on lesion length, vessel diameter, calcification degree, plaque morphology, etc. We are well aware of the value of IVUS, yet it remains underused, both in developed and underdeveloped countries.

 

This meta-analyzis included 8 randomized studies of patients with complex lesions (long or requiring ≥4 stents, small vessels, bifurcations or chronic total occlusions) with at least one year follow up.

 

In all, 3,276 patients were analyzed; 1,635 were guided with IVUS and 1,671 with angiography. Populations were homogeneous. Follow up was at 1.4 ± 5 years.

 

Combined adverse events rate was reduced 36% with the use of IVUS (6.5% vs. 10.5%; p=0.0001), the same as lesion revascularization rate (5.5% vs. 9.2%; p=0.007) and there was a tendency to less cardiovascular death. There were no differences in events such as stent thrombosis and all cause death.

 

IVUS guided DES stenting showed significant benefits in combined events reduction in diabetic patients with long lesions undergoing acute coronary syndrome.

 

 

Conclusion

This meta-analyzis shows a significant reduction of combined adverse events and revascularization with IVUS guided DES implantation in coronary complex lesions.

 

Editorial Comment

These data show that the use of IVUS in coronary complex lesions reduces MACE at the expense of reintervention, especially in high risk populations. With this information we should start to use is more frequently.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

 

Original Title: Intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: Meta-analysis of randomized trial.

Reference: Chirag Bavishi et al, Am Heart J 2017;185:26-34.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...