Why We Should Use IVUS in Complex Coronary Lesions

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

IVUS in Complex Coronary LesionsDrug eluting stents (DES) have shown benefits in terms of restenosis vs. conventional bare metal stents (BMS). Many of the advantages of DES depend on correct implantation, especially in complex lesions.

 

In complex lesions, the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides important information on lesion length, vessel diameter, calcification degree, plaque morphology, etc. We are well aware of the value of IVUS, yet it remains underused, both in developed and underdeveloped countries.

 

This meta-analyzis included 8 randomized studies of patients with complex lesions (long or requiring ≥4 stents, small vessels, bifurcations or chronic total occlusions) with at least one year follow up.

 

In all, 3,276 patients were analyzed; 1,635 were guided with IVUS and 1,671 with angiography. Populations were homogeneous. Follow up was at 1.4 ± 5 years.

 

Combined adverse events rate was reduced 36% with the use of IVUS (6.5% vs. 10.5%; p=0.0001), the same as lesion revascularization rate (5.5% vs. 9.2%; p=0.007) and there was a tendency to less cardiovascular death. There were no differences in events such as stent thrombosis and all cause death.

 

IVUS guided DES stenting showed significant benefits in combined events reduction in diabetic patients with long lesions undergoing acute coronary syndrome.

 

 

Conclusion

This meta-analyzis shows a significant reduction of combined adverse events and revascularization with IVUS guided DES implantation in coronary complex lesions.

 

Editorial Comment

These data show that the use of IVUS in coronary complex lesions reduces MACE at the expense of reintervention, especially in high risk populations. With this information we should start to use is more frequently.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

 

Original Title: Intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: Meta-analysis of randomized trial.

Reference: Chirag Bavishi et al, Am Heart J 2017;185:26-34.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....