Why We Should Use IVUS in Complex Coronary Lesions

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

IVUS in Complex Coronary LesionsDrug eluting stents (DES) have shown benefits in terms of restenosis vs. conventional bare metal stents (BMS). Many of the advantages of DES depend on correct implantation, especially in complex lesions.

 

In complex lesions, the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides important information on lesion length, vessel diameter, calcification degree, plaque morphology, etc. We are well aware of the value of IVUS, yet it remains underused, both in developed and underdeveloped countries.

 

This meta-analyzis included 8 randomized studies of patients with complex lesions (long or requiring ≥4 stents, small vessels, bifurcations or chronic total occlusions) with at least one year follow up.

 

In all, 3,276 patients were analyzed; 1,635 were guided with IVUS and 1,671 with angiography. Populations were homogeneous. Follow up was at 1.4 ± 5 years.

 

Combined adverse events rate was reduced 36% with the use of IVUS (6.5% vs. 10.5%; p=0.0001), the same as lesion revascularization rate (5.5% vs. 9.2%; p=0.007) and there was a tendency to less cardiovascular death. There were no differences in events such as stent thrombosis and all cause death.

 

IVUS guided DES stenting showed significant benefits in combined events reduction in diabetic patients with long lesions undergoing acute coronary syndrome.

 

 

Conclusion

This meta-analyzis shows a significant reduction of combined adverse events and revascularization with IVUS guided DES implantation in coronary complex lesions.

 

Editorial Comment

These data show that the use of IVUS in coronary complex lesions reduces MACE at the expense of reintervention, especially in high risk populations. With this information we should start to use is more frequently.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

 

Original Title: Intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: Meta-analysis of randomized trial.

Reference: Chirag Bavishi et al, Am Heart J 2017;185:26-34.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...