Staged Complete Revascularization vs. Culprit Vessel PCI at Long-Term

Staged complete revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease is superior to culprit PCI only at five-year follow-up.

The outcomes of this retrospective analysis show the benefit of staged PCI, though it might be attenuated in diabetic patients. Outcomes are consistent with previously published randomized studies.

Nevertheless, we should remain cautious when interpreting this study in particular, since it is an observational study on “real world” patients and could be full of confounding factors. For instance, why some patients received complete revascularization and others did not; there must have been reasons behind the difference in results.

Read also: Bariatric Surgery Associated with a Lower Rate of Mortality Due to Infarction and Stroke.

Neither does the study offer answers as regards the best moment to complete revascularization (when stages should be).

This study was recently published in the American Journal of Cardiology. It included 1205 patients undergoing ST elevation MI and multivessel disease. Around half of patients received staged PCI and the rest only culprit PCI.

Propensity score matching was used to compare groups, leaving 415 patients with similar baseline characteristics in each branch.

Read also: New Percutaneous Devices to Prevent Embolism in Atrial Fibrillation.

After a 5-year follow-up, MACCE rate was lower (all cause death, MI, stroke, and unplanned revascularization) and it resulted 30.6% for the complete revascularization groups vs 34.5% for the culprit PCI group (HR 0.7, CI 95% 0.55 to 0.89). Patients in the complete revascularization group tended to present less MI and unplanned revascularization.

Outcomes were consistent in most subgroups except for diabetic patients. These group did not present lower MACCE rate regardless the strategy.

Patients with 3 vessel disease showed a more pronounced Benefit than the general population.

The studies COMPLETE and FULL REVASC, to be published soon, are expected to look further into this and make the guidelines give more specific recommendations.

Original Title: Long-term safety and efficacy of staged percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease.

Reference: Cui K et al. Am Heart J. 2019; Epub ahead of print.

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....