Dietary Supplements and Diets Show No Impact on Cardiovascular Risk

Americans spend billions in dietary supplements every year but, in truth, this money is only wasted, according to evidence form a recent study published in Intern Med.

Nuevas alternativas prometedoras para la insuficiencia mitral

Most of dietary interventions and nutritional supplements including multi-vitamins, selenium and antioxidants, do not reduce cardiovascular risk or mortality, according to this large analysis and systematic revision of several randomized studies.

Modest benefits were indeed observed when reducing salt consumption and when incorporating omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and folic acid.

On the other hand, combining calcium and vitamin D seems to increase stroke risk.

However, despite different guidelines and societies claim the evidence behind these recommendations is insufficient, one every other American consume some sort of vitamin or dietary supplement, and the proportion increases with age.


Read also: Supervised Exercise and Revascularization for Intermittent Claudication.


In this context, researchers wanted to provide quality evidence by testing the effect of nutritional supplements and, to this end, included 9 systematic reviews and 4 randomized studies with nearly one million participants. Data included studies VITAL and ASCEND, which studied the impact of vitamin D and omega-3.

Globally, they were able to find certain evidence that reduced salt consumption has a modest positive effect on global mortality in persons with normal blood pressure (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.85-0.95) and a more significant positive effect on cardiovascular mortality in hypertensives (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.46-0.99).

Additionally, “low certainty” evidence suggested omega-3 acids reduce the risk of infarction and heart disease.

There was also “low certainty” evidence that folic acid reduced stroke risk, though this benefit was driven basically by one single study conducted in China.


Read also: Many Guidelines, Much Confusion. Blood Pressure Targets in the Elderly.


Finally, and with “moderate certainty”, calcium and vitamin D supplements would increase stroke risk (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.05-1.30).

No other supplement, including vitamins A, B complex, C, D or E, antioxidants, iron or other dietary interventions (including reduced fat intake) impact mortality or cardiovascular events, neither positively nor negatively.

Most people are wasting their money in vitamins, buying supplements at the pharmacy, when it would be more sensible, rational and a lot cheaper to buy vitamins at the groceries’.

Most surprisingly, the “Mediterranean diet” showed no impact, seeing as the PREDIMED outcomes suggest the benefit of diets rich in vegetables, whole grains, nuts and olive oil. Researchers speculate these results might have been counterbalanced with other study results with null outcomes.

Original title: Effects of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on cardiovascular outcomes: an umbrella review and evidence map.

Reference: Khan SU et al. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171:190-198.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...