ESC 2019 | CONDI-2ERIC-PPCI: Final Blow Against Ischemic Pre-Conditioning in Primary Angioplasty

Remote ischemic conditioning does not offer any clinical benefit to patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty, according to this study presented on Sunday at the European Society of Cardiology Congress 2019.

Prior studies were limited and small, but this analysis seems to provide definitive evidence with regard to ischemic pre-conditioning. The way to improve must be found somewhere else.

The study randomized 5401 patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty to remote ischemic pre-conditioning (either in the ambulance or on hospital admission) or not. The pre-conditioning procedure was performed intermittently through four cycles of 5-minute inflation of a blood-pressure cuff.


Read also: ESC 2019 | THEMIS-PCI: Unlike in the Main Study, Here Ticagrelor Is Indeed Effective.


After 1 year of follow-up, there were no differences between the control and active groups regarding the primary endpoint of cardiac death or heart failure readmission. There were also no differences in the secondary endpoints (a composite of cardiac death and heart failure readmission at 30 days, and major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events [MACCE] at 30 days and 1 year).

Results were consistent across subgroups (by age, diabetes status, infarct location, final TIMI flow, and time elapsed from first medical contact to balloon inflation).

Other forms of ischemic pre-conditioning, such as pharmacologic compounds (exenatide and cyclosporin) or mechanical postconditioning and balloon reinflation in the coronary artery, have also failed.

Original Title: Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: the CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI trial.

Reference: Botker HE. Presentado el 1 de septiembre en el ESC 2019. Paris, Francia.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...