Virtual ACC 2020 | PRECOMBAT: 10 Years for Surgery vs. Angioplasty in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

After 10 years of follow-up, there were no significant differences in the rates of major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events among patients with left main coronary artery disease randomized to angioplasty or surgery. Since this was the first study to randomize patients with left main coronary artery disease to angioplasty or surgery, it enrolled very few patients. As a consequence, it lacks the statistical power to generate definitive conclusions.

The PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) study randomized 300 patients to angioplasty with a sirolimus-eluting stent and another 300 patients to surgery, to treat left main coronary artery disease in 13 Korean hospitals between 2004 and 2009.

The follow-up was extended to 10 years for all patients, with a mean of 11.3.

After this incredibly long period, the primary composite endpoint of death, infarction, stroke, or target vessel revascularization occurred in 29.8% of patients in the angioplasty arm and 24.7% of patients in the surgery arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1.69).


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | Controversial Trial ISCHEMIA Finally in NEJM.


The outcomes are practically identical between strategies once revascularization is excluded (18.2% vs. 17.5%; HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.44).

All-cause death rates were also quite similar (14.5% vs. 13.8%).

The only variable differentiating both strategies at 10 years is, as expected, target vessel revascularization (16.1% vs. 8.0%).

Conclusion

The 10-year follow-up of pioneer study PRECOMBAT shows us similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events among patients with left main coronary artery lesions randomized to angioplasty or surgery.

precombat-10-anos

Original Title: Ten-Year Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Disease. Extended Follow-Up of the PRECOMBAT Trial.

Reference: Duk-Woo Park et al. Circulation 2020; Epub ahead of print y presentado en forma virtual en el ACC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: does it really help reduce contrast use?

Contrast-induced nephropathy remains a relevant complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and complex coronary anatomies. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap...

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...