Infarction, Stroke and Aortic Emergency Syndromes in the Shadow of the Pandemic

The coronavirus pandemic has had a negative impact on the most pressing cardio and neurological emergencies, such as strokes or aortic dissection. These emergencies are normally treated in high complexity centers, which is why it is relatively simple to analyze the number of transfers before and after the pandemic. 

Infartos, strokes y síndromes aórticos ¿Todas las emergencias a la sombra de la pandemia?

For some time, care centers have been using emergency activation protocols to bypass admission bureaucracy and bed availability checking in case of critical patient transfer, such as patients with ST elevation MI, acute stroke or aortic emergencies (aneurysms or dissections).

During the pandemic, there have been changes in activation criteria, transfer availability and the capacity of specialized services to treat emergencies. 

Emergency daily transfers were stratified in “historical” (between January 2019 and March 2020) and “intra-pandemic” (March to May 2020).


Read also: SOLACI Webinar | Nurses and Technicians | Structural Interventionism.


The study looked at the three types of cardiovascular emergencies separately.

The number of daily transfers dropped to nearly half during the pandemic compared against baseline (4.2±2.2 a 2.5±1.5; p<0.001).

Subgroup analyzis showed similar relative reductions for the three types of emergencies, though aortic emergencies did not reach significance, probably because of the low number of cases (lower than 1 per baseline day).


Read also: Temporary Emergency Guidelines for Infarction During the Pandemic.


Patients might not be consulting because of fear of catching the infection of because they assume the regular services will not be available. 

Whatever the reason, the impact in public health care is substantial and global, and with multiple reports of a significant increase in sudden deaths at home. 

Many of these deaths could be Covid-19 cases, but they could also be infarctions, strokes or aortic emergencies following their natural course.

These findings highlight the importance of public health education for these patients to be able to continue coming to hospitals when experiencing serious symptoms such as chest pain, or symptoms associated to stroke. 

CIRCOUTCOMES-120-006938-free

Título original: Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Critical Care Transfers for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, and Aortic Emergencies.

Referência: Umesh N. Khot et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020, article in press. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006938.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

A New Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Paradigm? CREST-2 Trial Unified Results

Severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis continues to be controversial seeing the optimization of intensive medical therapy (IMT) and the availability lower periprocedural risk revascularization techniques....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...