TCT 2021 | STOPDAPT-2 and MASTER-DAPT: The Conversation Continues from ESC to TCT

Research on short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is still controversial. These discussions, however, seem to lead to the consensus that beyond the “category” of bleeding or ischemic risk, what is most important is a decision tailored to the patient being treated. DAPT duration should be individual, instead of standardized by a risk score.

TCT 2021 | STOPDAPT-2 y MASTER-DAPT: la discusión continúa del ESC al TCT

In the MASTER-DAPT study in patients with acute coronary syndromes and high bleeding risk, a short-term DAPT did not increase the rate of ischemic events. Results did show fewer bleeding events.

Eventually, the bleeding risk is probably more relevant than the ischemic risk.

MASTER-DAPT analyzed specifically DAPT duration after angioplasty in patients at high risk for bleeding (a third of them receiving anticoagulant agents). It showed that DAPT for one month was non inferior to 3+ months, in terms of both net clinical adverse events and major adverse events. Furthermore, bleeding was less frequent with a shorter therapy.

The prespecified analysis in MASTER-DAPT included 4579 patients with acute coronary syndrome. There was no significant difference in this subgroup between both DAPT strategies.

This might seem irrelevant, but it indicates that even in patients with the highest risk for ischemic events (as those with acute coronary syndrome), a shorter therapy does not increase their risk.


Read also: TCT 2021 | OPTIMUM: Surgically Ineligible Patients with Complex Anatomy: Do We Accept the Case?


Results from almost 6000 patients were pooled into a “total cohort” in STOPDAPT-2. About a third of subjects were at high risk for bleeding. All patients, either at high or standard risk for bleeding, were randomized to 1-month vs. 12-month DAPT.

The short DAPT was non-inferior for the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, infarction, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding.

Unsurprisingly, major bleeding was higher with the 12-month treatment.


Read also: TCT 2021 | SWISS-APERO: Difference in Leaks between the Amulet and the Watchman.


A numerical increase of cardiovascular events with clopidogrel monotherapy in acute patients warrant the need for further research.

On the other hand, as regards cardiovascular and bleeding events, compared with 12-month DAPT, 1-month DAPT was consistent beyond bleeding risk and, also, in patients who underwent complex angioplasty.

Original title: STOPDAPT-2 total cohort: pooled results from two randomized controlled trials of clopidogrel monotherapy after 1-month DAPT following PCI, and subgroup analyses by ACS presentation, HBR, and complex PCI. MASTER-DAPT: a randomized trial of abbreviated antiplatelet therapy in HBR patients. Outcomes in high bleeding risk patients with high thrombotic and ischemic risk.

Reference: Obayashi Y et al. Smits PC et al. Presentados durante las sesiones científicas del TCT 2021.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

Is upper-limb aerobic training an effective alternative to lower-limb exercise in peripheral artery disease?

Peripheral artery disease is associated with impaired functional capacity, reduced walking distance, and poorer quality of life, and structured exercise is a class I...