ACC 2022 | PROMPT-HF

Patients with cardiac failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are sub treated when you look at guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT).   

ACC 2022

The aim of this study was to assess if, using an electronic registry, we can alert treating physicians and optimize medical treatment.  

100 healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses, etc) were randomized to receiving and alert or receiving no alert.   

Primary end point was an increase in the number of GDMT indications prescribed at 30 days. 

It included 1310 ambulatory patients, mean age 72, 31% women. Mean ejection fraction was 32%. Primary end point reached 26% in the alert group vs 19% in the no alert group. There was over 40% increased GDMT optimization in the alert group (P=0.03).

Conclusion

Patients on the alert electronic scheme increased prescription rate and optimized GDMT. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org .

Reference: Van Spall HGC, Fonarow G, Mamas MA. Under-utilization of guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure: can digital health technologies PROMPT change? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...