Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Clinical Outcomes according to Device Implantation Depth

Continuous improvement of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices has had a positive impact on the safety and efficacy of this technique. However, device related thrombus formation (DRT) is still a major concern because of the associated increased risk of thromboembolic events. Approaching this complication calls for more intense antithrombotic treatments, which in turn involves a higher risk of bleeding. 

Cierre de orejuela de aurícula izquierda: Resultados clínicos según la profundidad del implante del dispositivo

Multiple clinical, anatomical and procedural factors have been shown to increase the risk of DRT. Among the procedural factors, we find implantation depth. However, data on this aspect are limited to small studies and the differences between devices remains unclear. 

The aim of this retrospective and multicenter study was to assess the role of implantation depth in the formation of DRT. 

Primary end point was device implantation depth (proximal or distal) impact on DRT incidence. Secondary end point focused on DRT incidence relative to implantation area or angle between pulmonary vein crest and device surface. In addition, clinical outcomes and complications were collected both during hospitalization and follow-up. DRT diagnosis was made by transesophageal echocardiography or CT, and defined as the presence of thrombi adhered to device atrial surface.

Read also: Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Impact on Post-Procedural Gradient.

The sample included 1317 patients of mean age 74.9, mostly men. 56% of patients underwent proximal device implantation while the remaining 44% received distal implantation. There were no significant differences in procedural outcomes between the groups.  

Proximal implantation patients saw low DRT rate, vs distal implantation patients (2.3% vs 12.2%; P < 0.001), regardless of device type. There were no significant differences in secondary end point. At multivariable analysis, distal implantation and single antiplatelet treatment or its absence (HR: 1.62; CI del 95%: 0.99-2.62) resulted indented factors of DRT.

Conclusion

This study showed that LAAO device implantation depth impacts DRT incidence, and that proximal implantation is the preferred strategy for patients undergoing this procedure. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Impact of Device Implant Depth After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

Reference: Pedro Cepas-Guillén, MD, PHD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Complex Decision

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis continues to pose a significant challenge when it comes to clinical decision-making, often due to the difficulty in identifying symptoms....

TAVI and Aortic Regurgitation: Are All Valves the Same?

Aortic regurgitation (AR) accounts for 0.5- 2.2% of all cases of valve disease in individuals over 65 years old. According to current guidelines, surgery is...

1-Year Outcomes of US TAVR Registry with 5th Generation Balloon Expandable Valves

The use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has extended to younger patients with lower risk severe aortic stenosis (AS) and therefore the improvement...

EuroSMR Registry: Edge-to-Edge Mitral Treatment with 5-Year Outcomes

Cardiomyopathies and left atrial enlargement can lead to secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). This condition is associated with ventricular dysfunction, causing heart failure, hospitalization, and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ROUTE TRAIL: DKCRUSH vs. DKRUSH Culotte in Non-Left Main Bifurcation Lesions

Coronary bifurcation lesions represent a frequent technical challenge, making between 15% and 20% of cases. Though provisional stenting is mostly used, complex bifurcations are...

TENDERA: Comparing Conventional vs. Distal Transradial Occlusion for Coronary Interventions

Supported by robust data, favorably compared against the transfemoral, the transradial approach has consolidated as the safest method for percutaneous intervention, particularly in terms...

Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Complex Decision

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis continues to pose a significant challenge when it comes to clinical decision-making, often due to the difficulty in identifying symptoms....