ESC 2023 | STOPDAPT-3 

Short Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), one to three months, followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy has been shown to reduce bleeding events without increased cardiovascular events vs. standard DAPT, according to guidelines.  However, the rate of major bleeding within the first month after procedure remains significant when using these strategies. 

ESC 2023

The use of aspirin-free therapies (ASA) after PCI with new generation stents, be it prasugrel or ticagrelor, did not result in increased stent thrombosis (ST) in a select group of patients at low risk, both with and without acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

In this context, the STOPDAPT-3 looked into the safety and efficacy of an aspirin-free strategy using prasugrel monotherapy vs. one month DAPT with ASA + prasugrel, in patients with ACS or high risk of bleeding undergoing PCI with everolimus eluting stents. 

The study included a total 6002 patients with ACS or high bleeding risk from 32 centers in Japan. Before stenting, patients were randomized 1:1 to receiving prasugrel monotherapy (3.75 mg/day) or DAPT with ASA and prasugrel. Both groups received 20 mg loading dose of prasugrel.

Read also: ESC 2023 | BUDAPEST CRT Upgrade trial.

Primary end points were major bleeding according to BARC (type 3 or 5) at one month (aiming at superiority) and cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, MI, stent thrombosis or stroke) at one month (aiming at non-inferiority).

5966 patients were looked at (2984 ASA-free and 2982 DAPT). Patient mean age was 71.6, and 23.4% were women. At one month, the ASA-free strategy was not superior in terms of bleeding (4.47% vs 4.71%, RR 0.95, CI del 95% 1.75-1.20; p for superiority=0.66). However, when looking at cardiovascular outcomes, ASA-free achieved non-inferiority vs DAPT (4.12% vs 3.69%; RR 1.12, CI 95% 0.87-1.45; p for non-inferiority=0.01).

Read also: ESC 2023 | FIRE-Trial: Physiology Guided Complete Revascularization Benefits Elderly Patients with Myocardial Infarction.

There were no differences in all-cause mortality and effects were similar for the secondary outcomes. Also, there were no differences in stent thrombosis between the groups. We should mention that the subgroup of ACS patients presented higher risk of events, especially the ASA-free group. 

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Source: Presented by Hot Line Sessions, Agosto 26, ESC Congreess 2023, Amsterdam.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...