ESC 2024 | POPular PAUSE TAVI: Continuation vs. Discontinuation of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy During TAVI

Due to their advanced age and comorbidities, many patients with severe aortic stenosis scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have atrial fibrillation (35%) or acquired von Willebrand disease, which often requires treatment with oral anticoagulants (OAC).

Researchers conducted a randomized study that included 858 patients in 22 European centers. These patients were randomized 1:1to either continue or discontinue anticoagulant treatment. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, major vascular complication, or major bleeding) 30 days after TAVI.

Regarding the primary endpoint, the event rate was 16.5% for the group that continued with OAC and 14.8% for the group that interrupted treatment, with a difference of 1.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] -3.1 to 6.6; p-noninferiority = 0.18). This indicates that continuing anticoagulant treatment was not noninferior to discontinuation.

Read also: ESC 2024 | NOTION 3 Trial: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with a Planned Transcatheter Aor.tic Valve Implantation

As for secondary events, the risk of any type of bleeding was higher in the continuation group (difference of 9.8%; 95% CI 3.9-15.6), mainly affecting minor bleeding, although there were some cases of major bleeding.

The authors concluded that there was no advantage in continuing anticoagulant treatment and emphasized that this is the first randomized study supporting the discontinuation of OAC prior to TAVI implantation.

Presented by Dirk Jan van Ginkel at the Hot-Line Sessions, ESC Congress 2024, August 30-September 2, London, England.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....