ESC 2025 | OPTION-STEMI: Timing of Complete Revascularization During the Initial Hospitalization in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease

In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD), the optimal timing for complete revascularization (CR) had not been clearly established. Previous studies showed that immediate CR was not inferior to deferred CR, although most deferred procedures were performed after hospital discharge. The question was whether outcomes differed between immediate CR and deferred CR performed during the same hospitalization.

This was a randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial that included 994 patients (with at least one significant lesion ≥50% in a non-culprit vessel ≥2.5 mm in diameter), assigned to either immediate complete revascularization (n=498) or deferred revascularization during hospitalization (n=496). Patients with cardiogenic shock, ≥50% unprotected left main disease, chronic total occlusions in non-culprit vessels, or a history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery were excluded.

In the results, immediate revascularization did not demonstrate non-inferiority compared with deferred revascularization. The primary endpoint (all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization at 1 year) occurred in 10.0% vs 7.4% (HR 1.36; 95% CI 0.88–2.09; non-inferiority p=0.32). Mortality was 5% vs 3% (HR 1.65; 95% CI 0.83–3.27), showing a trend toward higher risk with the immediate strategy, although not statistically significant. Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 3.6% vs 2.8% (HR 1.29; 95% CI 0.58–2.86) and unplanned revascularization in 2.8% vs 2.4% (HR 1.16; 95% CI 0.48–2.78), with no relevant differences. Overall, the immediate strategy showed a trend toward more events, particularly early deaths.

Read also: ESC 2025 | PULSE: Coronary CT Angiography vs Ischemia-Guided Follow-Up After Unprotected Left Main PCI.

The authors concluded that, in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, immediate complete revascularization was not non-inferior to deferred revascularization during hospitalization in terms of mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization at one year.

Reference: Youngkeun Ahn et al. Presentado en Major Late Breaking Trials, ESC 2025, Madrid, España. Publicado en The Lancet, 31 de agosto de 2025.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....