ESC 2025 | PULSE: Coronary CT Angiography vs Ischemia-Guided Follow-Up After Unprotected Left Main PCI

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez.

Unprotected left main (ULM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains associated with a high risk of adverse events, even with the use of second-generation drug-eluting stents and optimal medical therapy. Post-procedural follow-up is usually symptom-driven, but the usefulness of a systematic coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-based surveillance strategy had not been evaluated in a randomized trial.

The PULSE study was a multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial designed to compare routine CCTA follow-up at 6 months versus standard symptom/ischemia-guided follow-up. Hospitalized patients with chronic or acute coronary syndrome and an indication for ULM PCI were included.

Between October 2019 and September 2023, a total of 606 patients were enrolled. Of these, 84% presented with acute coronary syndrome. Intracoronary imaging was used in 70% of procedures, and 80% had distal ULM lesions. A total of 303 patients were assigned to planned CCTA at 6 months, and 303 to standard follow-up.

The primary endpoint (MACE: all-cause death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or stent thrombosis at 18 months) occurred in 12.5% of the CCTA group and 11.9% of the control group (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.76–1.23), with no significant differences. In secondary analyses, spontaneous myocardial infarction was less frequent in the CCTA group (0.9% vs 4.9%; HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07–0.84; p=0.025), at the expense of a higher number of revascularizations triggered by imaging findings. No differences in mortality were observed (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.49–1.25; p=0.30).

ESC 2025 | Can Colchicine Reduce Post-TAVR Conduction Disturbances?

The authors concluded that routine CCTA at 6 months after ULM PCI did not reduce the composite endpoint of MACE at 18 months. However, a significant reduction in spontaneous myocardial infarction was observed, albeit accompanied by a higher frequency of imaging-driven revascularizations.

Reference: De Filippo O. et al. en Major Late Breaking Trials, ESC 2025, Madrid, España.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...