IVUS – Measured Optimal Minimal Stent Area in Left Main Crossover Stenting

The current guidelines recommend the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during left main stenting to optimized PCI outcomes, to make sure devices are well positioned and adequately expanded. Even though there is no standard consensus on the definition of stent underexpansion, minimal stent area (MSA) measured by IVUS, is considered the most reliable predictor of future adverse events after left main PCI. 

Several studies have looked into MSA criteria in two-stent techniques; however, there is still little information on the optimal MSA values in left main PCI when using a single-stent crossover technique. 

The aim of this study was to identify IVUS-derived segmental MSA cutoff after left main crossover stenting aiming at predicting mayor adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 5 years.

The primary outcome was 5-year MACE, defined as the combination of all cause death, target vessel related acute MI and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). 

The study looked at 829 patients undergoing left main PCI towards the left anterior descending artery (LAD), assessed by IVUS after stenting. Patient mean age was 64 and they were mostly men. 37% of cases presented as acute coronary syndrome. Most patients presented single vessel left main disease (35.5%). Left main lesions involved the distal bifurcation in 73% of patients. 

Read also: Impact of Amyloidosis on Outcomes After TAVI.

Final MSA was measured in three segments: proximal LM, distal LM and LAD ostium. Cutoff values that best predicted 5-year MACE were 11.4 mm² for proximal LM (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.62), 8.4 mm² for distal LM (AUC: 0.58) and 8.1 mm² for LAD ostium (AUC: 0.57). Based on these thresholds, stent underexpansion in proximal LM was significantly associated with greater risk of MACE at 5 years (HR: 2.34; p < 0.001). In addition, patients with simultaneous underexpansion in distal LM and LAD ostium presented a significantly higher risk of MACE at 5 years, vs. adequate expansion or limited underexpansion in one single location (HR: 2.57; p < 0.001).

Conclusion 

This study looked at segmental MSA cutoff values assessed by IVUS in patients undergoing left main crossover stenting from the left main to the LAD for unprotected left main disease. Achieving optimal stent expansion in proximal left main and preventing underexpansion both in distal LM and AD ostium is paramount to improve long-term clinical outcomes. The identified optimal MSA thresholds may serve as practical references to stent optimization during left main PCI.

Original Title: Ultrasonido intravascular. Tronco de coronaria izquierda. Optimal minimal stent area after crossover stenting in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

Reference: Ju Hyeon Kim1, MD, PhD et al Eurointervention 2025;21:e1069-e1080.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...